BUSINESS leaders today welcomed Government plans for extending the new HS2 high-speed rail link – but there was a warning that the need to address failings within the existing network, including East Anglia’s main line, must not be ignored.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Proposed routes taking the new HS2 (High Speed Two) line to Manchester and Leeds, adding to the London-Birmingham route already announced, were unveiled yesterday, with the £32.7billion project expected to create at least 100,000 jobs.

Besides the impact of the new tracks on the countryside, sceptics claim the economic case for the lines does not stack up and that the new high-speed services will chiefly benefit London and the South-East by attracting investment away from the Midlands and the North.

John Dugmore, chief executive of Suffolk Chamber of Commerce, said yesterday that he believed the plans for HS2 (HS1 beinig the existing high speed link from London to the Channel Tunnel) were likely to be of economic benefit to the UK as a whole.

However, he added: “Ministers cannot and must not ignore the immediate priorities which are to sort out the failings in the existing network.

“In the East of England, investment by the Government in the Great Eastern Mail Line is a tiny fraction of what is required for HS2. It would though deliver massive benefits to the East Anglian economy and substantial benefits to UK plc.”

Similar views were expressed on a national basis by CBI director-general John Cridland. He said the plans showed “the same bold, long-term thinking that helped the Victorians build our original network” and would help to drive growth.

But he added: “HS2 cannot be built in isolation so we need sustained, additional capital investment in existing road and rail networks to meet increased demand.”

Steve Radley, policy director at the manufacturers’ organisation EEF, said: “Having made a commitment to both stages of High Speed Two by extending it to the North, the Government must now demonstrate that it has a credible plan to deliver this on time.

“This would send an important signal to business about Britain as a place to invest.”

3 comments

  • If all these people are arriving into uk wanting to travel to Manchaester, Birmingham and Leeds why dont they fly to those airports from Amsterdam why even fly into Heathrow. This seems an awful lot of money, destroying countryside and peoples lives when there is an answer already existing. We could of course use the money set aside for hispeed broadband as it isnt needed because all these people need to meet face to face if the business leaders are to be believed.Agruments do not seem to match up to me. I am with John Burls

    Report this comment

    jennifer jane

    Tuesday, January 29, 2013

  • I am a bear of little brain, so will someone please explain to me how saving half an hour or so on a journey North will benefit the economy by attracting investment. Are there not better ways to spend over £32 billion? And how will it create at least a hundred thousand presumably permanent jobs?

    Report this comment

    JOHN BURLS

    Monday, January 28, 2013

  • Although it's aeons of years away, if HS2 materialises it could spell very bad news for East Anglian passengers heading north via Peterborough. Why? Because the current service depends on big income from large numbers joining at or travelling via King's Cross. Most of these may well transfer to HS2 leaving many original services heavily uneconomic. As a result there will be fewer trains from King's Cross to stations north of York and onward into Scotland. As for through services heading to and from Aberdeen and Inverness, heaven knows! But be sure of one thing: HM Government,regardless of hue, will wish to maximise HS2 business to recoup building costs; East Anglia could well be a loser in that far, far off time. Oh curmudgeon that I am.

    Report this comment

    Gotrain

    Wednesday, January 30, 2013

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT