Let Speaker Martin carry on - for now

A DEFIANT Speaker of the House of Commons has said he's not going anywhere and is determined to head an inquiry into parliamentary expenses and allowances. In other words, Michael Martin is daring MPs to sack him.

Of course, the Speaker is virtually fire proof. The Government can't dismiss him, and quite rightly so. Although the separation of powers is not so marked as in the United States, the executive has no ostensible ability to interfere in the duties and responsibilities of the legislative. It could engineer a coup by its backbenchers, but that would be a tricky and dangerous course to follow.

MPs are unlikely to revolt against the Speaker. He has the power to make or break MPs and as long as mud is sticking to Mr Martin over his expenses, they are pretty safe from too many inquiring hacks.

Mr Martin can do the country a massive favour by taking a knife to the nice little earners MPs currently enjoy over and above their salaries. After that. I would hope he would announce he is stepping down from a job to which he is not entirely suited. I have no objection to a person with working class and trade union roots from the mean streets of Glasgow reaching the top of the House of Commons pole - indeed it is rather refreshing. But like Governments, Speakers should regularly change to keep democracy alive and kicking. 

     

posted on 26 February 2008 12:01 by Graham Dines

Comments

01 March 2008 19:27 by John w

# re: Let Speaker Martin carry on - for now

For goodness sake what a load of drivel.
We will have ex cons sitting on the bench next if we allow someone who is possibly guilty of the crimes he is supposed to be presiding over to carry on.It makes one feel very uncomfortable being governed by these people who are milking us for all they can get.The speaker is a poacher turned gamekeeper and a sichophant to the system, just like a recent dp.
02 March 2008 18:48 by Graham Dines

# re: Let Speaker Martin carry on - for now

Drivel or not, the Speaker has not been found guilty of any wrongdoing and he hasn't even been told he's got a case to answer. If the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, the Electoral Commission, the Metropolitcan Police or the Director of Public Prosecutions deem Martin has broken the rules, he will have to stand aside to try to clear his name.