Young Tim's Colchester definition of a successful government

CONSTRUCTIVE criticism and principled opinions are, I hope, the distinguishing hallmark of impartial journalists. They set us apart from posturing politicians for whom everything the Government does is either outstanding or absolutely hopeless, depending from which view point they are coming.

Colchester's Labour leader on the borough is one Timothy Young of this parish. Wife Julie is also a councillor.serving on both Essex county and Colchester district. They seem to be here, there and everywhere representing Labour on all manner of public bodies. Thus, their devoted loyalty to Gordon Brown is, as you might expect, almost wholly unquestioning.

In a letter published in the EADT on Tuesday, Young Tim seems not to like the "constructive criticism and principled opinions" which feature in the columns of the East Anglian Daily Times. As I'm responsible for the political content, the person in his sights is clearly yours truly.

I normally allow my critics to have their say and don't exercise the right of reply. But not this time.

According to Young Tim, the EADT is crammed with "doom-ridden articles about the travails of the government and political opinion and analysis bordering on the hysterical about how useless the Prime Minister is."

I don't recall ever descriobing the Prime Minister as useless - incompetent maybe, ditherer yes, u-turner extraordinaire most certainly, but never useless. 

To Young Tim, Bottler Brown may have made mistakes - the election that never was and the abolition of the 10p tax rate - "yet he has the gravitas, experience and capability to lead this nation through difficult times and towards a brighter future." Can't you just hear the stirring strains of Land of Hope and Glory playing in the background when this fulsome support was being penned.

In the belief that both the EADT and myself are giving open support to the Conservatives, Young Tim lashes out at Call Me Dave, describing him as a "shallow, lightweight opportunist with a track record to be ashamed of and all the leadership skills of a failed Big Brother contestant." In a very partisan way, Young Tim sneers oat the Tories for having "no policies, no principles and a lack of direction which is only matched by a lack of scrutiny by the media, including the EADT."

Well, what can I say? Which party thinks it is democtratic to allow MPs from Scotland and Wales to vote on English health and education policy when English MPs are barred from a say on free university tuition in Scotland and free prescriptions in Wales because these are devolved matters, funded of course by the English?  

Anything else? Plenty, but suffice to say that a million-plus voters in London, and the good folk of Crewe & Nantwich and Henley took the view that under Bottler, Labour has lost its way. I'm the first to acknowledge that "events, dear boy, events" as Harold Macmillan so aptly said, are navigating the UK towards an iceberg, but the Scottish mafia in charge of this government is upsetting not just the electorate but a number of their own MPs.

And if Glasgow East is lost to the Scottish Nationalists, it might just be the tipping point for a full-scale rebellion by Labour's union paymasters.

There's one thing you can say in praise of Bottler. His flailing about has certainly made politics fun again.

 

  

posted on 03 July 2008 09:07 by Graham Dines

Comments

04 July 2008 08:40 by Tim Young

# re: Young Tim's Colchester definition of a successful government

First time I've ever read your blog Graham. It proves my point I think and I'm tempted to rest my case but, having just returned from Bournemouth and the LGA Conference where I saw and heard Cameron in the flesh for the first time, I am now even more convinced that my analysis of him was charitable. He didn't even live down to my low expectations. Slick and stylish maybe; shallow and unpleasant definitely. Even Nick Clegg demonstrated depth and substance in comparison and Hazel Blears was light years ahead in terms of knowledge and passion for politics. If the Tories do win the next election (by no means certain) then we will return to Thatcherism - it may be Thatcherism with a better PR gloss - but it'll be Thatcherism all the same which would be disastrous for my constituents on the Greenstead estate in Colchester who have benefited massively under Labour since 1997. And you still haven't accepted my invitation to come and visit the ward so that I can show you Labour's transformation of a place over the last 11 years. I guess it doesn't fit with your journalistically remote view of life. Finally I refer you to Manny Shinwell re the best Tory government you can think of versus the worst Labour government you can think of...and, by the way, Brown's is far from the worst!
04 July 2008 09:15 by Graham Dines

# re: Young Tim's Colchester definition of a successful government

The best post-war Tory goverment was the 1957-59 administration of Harold Macmillan; the worst Labour one is undoubtedly the Labour era under Gordon Brown, closely followed by the Attlee 1950-51.
What comes around goes around. I would agree there is no certainty in politics - and Brown could rise again, although the best he and Labour can realistically hope for is to be the largest party in a hung parliament.
If you knew my background and upbringing in the north of England, you would know I don't have a remote view of life. I'll accept your invitation to a tour of Greenstead, in the company of Labour's parliamentary candidate when you get around to choosing one. But that surely will serve the point I make about a General Election campaign which concentrates on a high profile and robust defence of Gordon Brown.