Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 20°C

min temp: 12°C

ESTD 1874 Search

Bentwaters: Opponents say planners have ‘no option’ but to reject flying from former air base

06:02 12 July 2014

Bentwaters

Bentwaters

Campaigners fighting to stop what they assert would be an increase in flying at a former military air base claim planners have no option but to refuse the proposals.

shares

The Bentwaters Campaign Group (BCG) has handed Suffolk Coastal District Council a 32-page submission outling its opposition to Bentwaters Parks’ blueprint for the future of the 940-acre site.

The owners’ proposals include formalising uses for nearly 200 buildings and permitting 960 air movements a year, an average of less than two flights a day, for heritage aircraft and occasional business flights.

BCG says it is happy for the Spitfire at Bentwaters to fly on 28 days a year as this would not harm the tranquility of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), and also supports an annual air show as “this is consistent with the heritage needs and represents the right balance”.

BCG leader Mike Sherwen said the National Planning Policy Framework did not permit major development in an AONB unless there are exceptional circumstances, a demonstrable public interest, no other suitable location and a need for the development.

He said: “Our team has thoroughly reviewed every letter written to the council, the local plans, the policy framework and the reasons why the inspector reached his conclusions.

“We can see no basis in law or policy for the planners to conclude that this application should be approved, unless they change the local policy on the hoof, which would be unreasonable.

“There is no benefit to the local economy in the current proposal but potentially significant detriment to existing businesses such as tourism, music at Snape and even those on the base, such as data storage.

“We have considered all the arguments to ensure we have reached a balanced view on all the relevant issues.”

Mr Sherwen said if the council departed from the local plan, it could leave itself open to a “judicial review” of its decision – unless it could demonstrate cogent reasons for such a material departure.

The owners of Bentwaters say their proposals aim to regularise the use of the site.

They deny there will be an increase in flying and have submitted an environmental impact assessment which says there will be no harm to the tranquility of the area.

shares

10 comments

  • Mr Sherwen needs to get a life and look at the positives. I visited Duxford recently and the Spirtfires were in the air every half an hour and such a crowd just wanting to pay to get on them, they are part of our heritage, our fore fathers who won the war with them too. and to suggest a “judicial review” to bully the council is rediculous and shows he knows his plan is weak!!

    Report this comment

    newsaddict

    Monday, July 14, 2014

  • I am sorry but the airfield has been there a long time and to see it being used more can only be a positive thing. How 2 flights a day could spoil the AONB and how it would disturb concerts at Snape etc is beyond me. This is once again down to a minority of people who do not want a working airfield on their doorstep although it was probably there long before them!! How much public opinion has been sought on this?

    Report this comment

    Voice of Reason

    Sunday, July 13, 2014

  • Firstly the area in question has been outstanding since long before the base was built in WW2 and despite all its military traffic this hasn't changed. 2nd, The area has developed as has Snape almost because of the base and the area certainly profited from the USAF. If noise is REALLY the concern of the BCG then common sense says this can be almost eliminated by a stipulation that aircraft climb straight ahead before turning North which will clear TunstallEyke. Old aircraft could even be required to turn right into the circuit which would keep them within the confines of the base. The 960 moves (1 up 1 down) will due to weather and holidays probably be 10 flight per week. More than this are made from Hadleigh and probably Pettaugh as well without spoiling. anything.

    Report this comment

    Brian Bridle

    Saturday, July 12, 2014

  • Councillor Sherwin should try putting forward the views of his entire electorate rather than the chosen few who are against the plans.

    Report this comment

    Dean

    Saturday, July 12, 2014

  • well done mr sherwen finally stopped hiding behind the title of spokeman for bcg. I see now you have taken to speaking for snape music as well, you also seem to have good line into the eadt,You may both need reminding this country is a democarcy

    Report this comment

    saxon

    Saturday, July 12, 2014

  • So just a reminder, who elected BCG to talk for the rest of us? Don't we all elect District Councilors to decide these matters once officers have considered all aspects of any application? Why do you keep repeating this story when nothing new is being reported?

    Report this comment

    amsterdam81

    Saturday, July 12, 2014

  • I would just like to clarify that flying at Bentwaters does help increase local economy. When my family and I have visited for a random chance of seeing the spitfire we generally either visit somewhere for food or use f the local shops at the same time. We have often seen other people drive around for the same reason a possible glimpse of the spitfire. Perhaps on a more positive note a website or twitterfacebook message could be available when flying expected to generate even more local spending.

    Report this comment

    deben27

    Saturday, July 12, 2014

  • This may have escaped Mike Sherwen's notice but... The Bentwaters airfield is already there and the "Major development" occurred before AONB were even thought of! The Over 7,000 signatures on petitions supporting the plans, also shows that there is " a demonstrable public interests".

    Report this comment

    kevinwj

    Saturday, July 12, 2014

  • All those who are now objecting to flying from Bentwaters airfield did not live in the area when it was an operational military airbase. If they had would they have objected then? Many in the local area mostly those at each end of the runways had a lot of noise to put up with. the proposed flying is by comparison very quiet and restricted to "day light" only. The effect on Snape Maltings is in my view very small. Some of the commercial flights that cross the area do make much more noise when they fly towards a landing. When I ask is someone going to object to the noise and disturbance caused by off road unsilenced motorcycles in the forest areas and the danger from inconsiderate riders.

    Report this comment

    bigbobbybear

    Saturday, July 12, 2014

  • Yet more bully boy rhetoric from the BCG. Lets all disappear from Suffolk as clearly they want to be in charge of everything to allow it to be a fossil in a museum. Some things need to change for heavens sake...this NIMBYist attitude being one thing.

    Report this comment

    Scuzzer

    Saturday, July 12, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Figures presented in an operational performance report for the county show that the equivalent of 31 12-hour shifts were spent by ambulance staff treating patients who could not be admitted to A&E within 15-minutes of arrival.

Mildenhall Lodge Care Home.

Providing care for those in extreme old age, and with serious long-term health problems, is one of the major challenges facing society – especially for an area like East Anglia which has a disproportionately high number of older people.

Tents uprooted from their pegs at Jimmy's Farm.

More than 18,500 people attended the festival at the 100-acre farm in Wherstead at the weekend, which was hit by heavy rainfall.

South East Suffolk Magistrates Court in Elm Street.

An Ipswich man is awaiting his fate after admitting assaulting two security officers called to a court because he said he had filmed proceedings.

Ipswich Town boss Mick McCarthy in deep discussion with assistant Terry Connor following Saturday's limp 1-0 home defeat to Norwich City.

Ticket prices for the Ipswich Town home game against Sheffield Wednesday on August 15 have attracted a raft of criticism on social media.

The nature of care homes has changed. Picture posed by models.

The ageing of the population – with more people living into extreme old age and suffering from illnesses and conditions associated with that – has led to a major change in the profile of care home residents.

Grand opening of Care UK’s new Mildenhall Lodge care home.

Bosses at Care UK are confident that there will be no repetition of the problems that beset Mildenhall Lodge when its remaining new care homes open over the next few months.

Launch of the Get Connected event at Woodbridge library. The event aims to promote the library's online services and their importance to the people of Suffolk.
L-R  Alison Wheeler (General Manager), Helen Haynes, Tony Brown (chairman of the Suffolk Libraries Board),  and Sylvia Knight.

Suffolk’s library service will be marking its third anniversary as an independent organisation next weekend.

Joanne Mudhar, owner of the Oak Tree community farm in Rushmere St Andrew.

A Suffolk farm has turned to crowdfunding in an effort to keep itself afloat.

A three-vehicle crash on the eastbound slip road between the A140 and the A14 near Coddenham is causing delays.

A woman is in hospital after a two-vehicle crash on the eastbound slip road between the A140 and the A14 near Coddenham this morning.

Most read

Most commented

Topic pages