CAMPAIGNERS have criticised plans to build a wind turbine on the outskirts of a Suffolk town.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Developers have submitted an application to St Edmundsbury Borough Council for consent to build a 78metre tall turbine in Chilton Street near Clare. The location is near the spot where a similar project was shelved earlier this year because there wasn’t sufficient wind.

Chair of pressure group Stop Turbines Over Clare ( STOC), Iona Parker, said: “In our view, this area is not a suitable location for wind turbines, as it is rich in historical and architectural interest. The site is on the edge of the Stour Valley Project area and a turbine of this height would have a significant impact on views across the valley.

“There may also be noise and visual impacts for residents living nearby.”

Criticism has also come from Clare Town Council, which has opposed the plans.

Chairman Keith Haisman said: “Our policy is that commercial wind projects should be at least two kilometres from residential property and this one would only be about 700metres.

“The plan also does not contain an environmental impact assessment and there has been no consultation with residents.”

In July, BT announced it was shelving plans to build three wind turbines on neighbouring farmland, stating that there wasn’t “sufficient wind resource necessary to make a future wind project viable.”

“We were extremely surprised to find out that a planning application has been made for yet another turbine,” said Ms Parker.

“If there is no wind there, we cannot understand why there would be enough wind a few hundred metres away.”

Meanwhile, separate plans have also been submitted for consent to put up a meteorological monitoring mast near Lords Wood, midway between Clare, Stoke-by-Clare, Hundon and Kedington.

Ms Parker said the company behind the proposals, West Coast Energy (WCE), wants to build a wind farm on the spot. She said she has seen plans for a scheme consisting of up to 10 turbines each 126m tall.

Planning director at WCE, Steve Salt, said: “A wind energy development near Clare is something that we are interested in progressing in order to meet our nation’s challenging climate change and green energy targets.

“However, feasibility and environmental studies are still ongoing and we are not in a position to confirm our programme for community engagement or the submission of a planning application.”

3 comments

  • he Greater Gabbard Wind Farm, 14 miles off the Suffolk coast, is almost complete. It will deliver 500MW of electricity from 140 turbines, enough to power around 500,000 homes. It is proposed that Greater Gabbard be extended, with another 140 wind turbines sited around 17 miles off our coast, in what is known as the Galloper Wind Farm. This application for this project has been accepted by the Planning Inspectorate, and the application will be considered later this year. The East Anglia Offshore Wind Farm is the second largest proposed offshore wind farm in the UK, at 6,000km2, and with an indicative capacity of 7,200MW, could power over 5 million homes, according to the project developers. The Planning Inspectorate is expecting an application by 1st November 2012. thats 1500-2100 Turbines Build them out at sea!!!

    Report this comment

    RowanMook

    Saturday, October 13, 2012

  • When will the "MIMBY's" of Clare and surrounding areas realise that fossil fuels are a finite resource and won't last forever. Our children and future generations have a bleak outlook if we don't progress other sources of Carbon free energy, NOW !

    Report this comment

    G7SHX

    Tuesday, October 9, 2012

  • The objections to the proposal relate to the suitability of the specific site for windturbines, NOT to denial of the value of renewable sources of energy. Note that a previous application for turbines on neighbouring land was withdrawn by the proposer due to there being "insufficient wind resource".

    Report this comment

    Rolf

    Wednesday, October 10, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT