East Suffolk: County pressed to make stronger demands for A12 four villages bypass

A lorry negotiates its way through Farnham A lorry negotiates its way through Farnham

Andrew Hirst andrew.hirst@archant.co.uk
Saturday, August 9, 2014
3:01 PM

Council chiefs have been called upon to “raise their game” in negotiating a better transport solution for villagers in east Suffolk.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Heavy traffic squeeze through the narrow gap on the A12 through the village of Farnham



Photo: Colin Shaw



EADT



EADT 3 07 04

EADT 26 07 04

EADT 3 09 04

EADT 30.11.09Heavy traffic squeeze through the narrow gap on the A12 through the village of Farnham Photo: Colin Shaw EADT EADT 3 07 04 EADT 26 07 04 EADT 3 09 04 EADT 30.11.09

Politicians and campaigners behind plans for an A12 bypass around four traffic blighted villages agreed during crunch talks on Thursday night that Suffolk County Council (SCC) should make a greater economic case for the scheme.

Villagers in Little Glemham, Marlesford, Farnham and Stratford St Andrew, have been calling for the new road to be built for decades.

They claim the volume of traffic is unbearable for small village roads, dangerous for its residents and a pollution hazard, which will only worsen with the proposed construction of Sizewell C power station.

The county council has been negotiating with Sizewell developers EDF Energy to secure funding for the bypass as part of its transport plan, but is yet to receive a concrete offer.

Many of those attending the latest meeting of the Four Villages Bypass Group, which included MPs, Therese Coffey and Dan Poulter, Lord Marlesford, council officers and councillors, have spoken of the need for SCC to make stronger demands.

Lord Marlesford said: “We’ve got to challenge the county council to be more effective negotiators with EDF – it’s not really on for EDF to be deciding on the pattern of Suffolk’s transport plan,” he said.

County councillor Stephen Burroughes agreed the authority needed to “raise its game”.

He also suggested setting up a task force to investigate the economic case for the bypass. “We need to build a business case demonstrating the strategic importance of the A12 and take that to EDF and government,” he said.

Dr Poulter suggested the economic case could help gain government backing for further improvements to the A12, but also stressed the importance of getting the county council to push harder for a better deal from EDF.

“I think it was a very productive meeting and I’m increasingly hopeful that we will be able to deliver the four villages bypass for the benefit of the community. I’m also confident the county council will be successful in ensuring EDF contribute a much fairer share towards the infrastructure project,” he said.

Graham Newman, who is responsible for highways at the county council, said he would “redouble efforts” in creating an economic case, but warned that a two-villages bypass might be more likely.

Debbi Tayler, spokesman for the campaigners, said she was concerned by any option other than the full four village option.

EDF Energy said it was undertaking a robust transport assessment to inform its proposals for Sizewell C Project, which will be presented at stage two of its consultation.

2 comments

  • To me they all sound like a load of tory 'wets' !, we will have to try harder to make a case ?, maybe settle for a 2 village by pass !....how 'wishy washy' is that !, no wonder it takes years to get anything done in this country !, mine you if there was a war which didn't really concern us...money would be no object !, as it hasn't over most of my lifetime !, I do not remember when we have not been engaged in a war somewhere in the world in all that time !. Other Countries must look at us and think 'What a load of Bloody Warmongers' !. Invest in the Infrastructure of Britain. NO chance !

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    freedomf

    Sunday, August 10, 2014

  • Dare I suggest that paying around 50 million pounds a DAY to the eu somewhat answers why we struggle to fund these projects?

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    sunwindwave

    Sunday, August 10, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT