Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 7°C

min temp: 1°C

ESTD 1874 Search

Easton: Controversial housing plans are a ‘violation of the countryside’

07:00 26 February 2014

File photo ofa housing estate being built

File photo ofa housing estate being built

Archant

Housing planned for an east Suffolk village would be out of character with its surroundings, cut off from the community and should be rejected, councillors have resolved.

shares

Easton Parish Council voted to recommend the refusal of Hopkins and Moore’s 17 dwelling development in the village on Monday night after more than 30 public opponents to the scheme turned out to watch.

Speaking in the public forum, residents raised concerns about the scale of the proposal, its impact on wildlife and the perceived problems with traffic – an ongoing issue in the village.

Sue Piggott highlighted the 28 letters of objection the application had received compared with the three in support as evidence of the strength of feeling, while Carolyn Godfrey-Hollins described it as a “violation of the countryside”.

Robert Eburne, a planning manager for Hopkins and Moore, responded to the criticisms, saying there was a “definite need for housing – particularly in Easton”.

He also highlighted the new car park the developer had offered Easton Primary School as an example of the benefits it could bring.

“We would commend this project to you because it’s unlike any other development in that it proposes wider benefits for the community,” he said.

Although parish chairman John Owen conceded the application was “possibly the only chance this council will get to resolve the car parking problem”, most councillors felt its benefits failed to outweigh the development’s adverse impacts.

Councillor Bob Gibbon said: “I don’t think we should sacrifice a big swathe of unspoilt countryside even if there are other benefits.”

Councillor John Kerr, the only member to vote in favour of the application, suggested the parking issue in the village was an “accident waiting to happen” and welcomed anything to improve the situation.

Mr Kerr also felt the council should not “dodge its responsibilities” by rejecting housing, and accused his colleagues of “nimbyism”.

Councillors, however, voted to recommend refusal by a margin of five to one. They also recommended conditions for Suffolk Coastal District Council to impose on the developer if it decided to approve the application.

shares

3 comments

  • Of course, all this building will not be free. Masons and other tradesmen cost.

    Report this comment

    Johnthebap

    Wednesday, February 26, 2014

  • Landowners are the only ones to gain from these developments, despite trying to sweeten the pill with 'parking improvements'. This is just greed, pure and simple.

    Report this comment

    Suffolk Boy

    Wednesday, February 26, 2014

  • And SCDC's planning committee will be ruling on this? You've had it Easton.

    Report this comment

    Johnthebap

    Wednesday, February 26, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Sir Bob Russell meets with Paul Geater.

A fortnight ago in my column I was discussing the importance (or not) of car parking prices in attracting visitors to a town for a shopping trip or general day out.

The A12 at Martlesham.

Two vehicles have crashed between the Tesco and BT roundabouts in Martlesham, closing the A12.

Mike Ambrose

The family of Kesgrave chef Michael Ambrose who died in a crash have urged anyone who has recently bought a motorbike or is thinking of buying one to get it assessed.

West Suffolk Hospital in Bury St Edmunds, where the woman is due to give birth in the next few days. Photograph Simon Parker

Doctors have been given permission by a specialist judge to perform a caesarean section on a pregnant 21-year-old Suffolk woman who is detained under mental health.

Sudbury resident George Buffham outside the Nestle Purina factory

Around £2million has been spent on measures to tackle foul odours emanating from a Sudbury pet food factory, it has emerged.

The Info Bar in Bury.

An “unexpected” decision by a landlord has seen a highly-valued drop-in centre lose its permanent home just a week after receiving an £800 donation.

Cabinet member for children Gordon Jones welcomed the new Ofsted report.

Suffolk County Council’s services for children has been rated good by Ofsted inspectors – but there are still elements of its work that require improvements.

Most read

Fred Olsen Travel Sale

cover

Click here to view
the Fred Olsen
Travel Sale

View

Most commented

HOT JOBS

Show Job Lists

Topic pages

Streetlife

Great British Life

Great British Life
MyDate24 MyPhotos24