Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 14°C

min temp: 7°C

ESTD 1874 Search

WIN A NEW HYUNDAI i10 - See the EADT on June 8 for full details

Essex/Suffolk: Woman separated from mentally unwell sister due to ‘maladministration’ by Essex County Council and North Essex Trust

10:08 23 January 2014

Two NHS trusts were criticised in the report for maladministration

Two NHS trusts were criticised in the report for maladministration

Archant

Two health trusts plus Essex and Suffolk County Councils have been told to apologise to a woman who was prevented from seeing her mentally unwell sister for three years because of their maladministration.

shares

The woman, known only as Mrs S, was falsely accused of abusing her mentally unwell sister in an Essex care home.

An investigation into whether she was taking money from her sister’s bank account resulted in her being unable to see her sister for three years.

Mrs S said she was made to feel “like a criminal” and the events had “destroyed her relationship with her sister”. As she didn’t know whether her sister is aware of the allegations she fears that her sister thinks she has “just abandoned her”.

A damning report has said North Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and Essex County Council were guilty of maladministration in the case.

The Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Trust, as well as Suffolk County Council who funded the woman’s care, were also accused of maladministration in the joint report by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman and the Local Government Ombudsman.

Mrs S’s sister, known as Ms P, was living in a residential care home in Clacton on September 2, 2010 when staff at the home raised concerns with Essex County Council that Mrs S had been named as a second person on her vulnerable sister’s bank account.

A second alert with the council raised concerns about emotional abuse of Ms P after she had been persuaded by her sister to change meals.

Mrs S received a letter in mid-October informing her that police were investigating allegations of financial abuse and that an application was being submitted to the Court of Protection for Suffolk County Council to be put in charge of her sister’s finances.

Mrs S was told not to contact her sister while the investigation was ongoing. However it subsequently emerged that neither the police nor the North Essex Trust were investigating the case. Despite this, protective measures remained in place and Mrs S continued to believe she couldn’t contact her sister until December 2011.

An investigation was eventually carried out by a manager at the Norfolk and Suffolk Trust, who found “no evidence to suggest financial exploitation” and that it was “reasonable to infer” that small sums of money withdrawn from the account of Ms P had been used to buy a savings bond for the care home resident.

But in their letter of December 2011, in response to a complaint from Mrs S, the Norfolk and Suffolk Trust said it had been appropriate for the North Essex Trust to implement safeguarding procedures and staff had no choice but to order Mrs S not to visit her sister following concerns that Ms P was being “financially and physically abused”. The reference to physical abuse was later surmised to be a “drafting error”.

In their report the ombudsman bodies found a catalogue of errors in how the case was handled which led to “injustice” for Mrs S.

Essex County Council failed to pass on the safeguarding referral form originally sent to them in September 2010 for four weeks, prolonging the period during which the allegations were hanging over Mrs S.

The decision by the North Essex Trust to tell Mrs S not to visit her sister was “disproportionate” without first finding out whether the police would investigate the claims. Furthermore the action would have been ineffective in any case as Mrs S still had access to at least one of her sister’s bank accounts.

The Norfolk and Suffolk Trust, and therefore Suffolk County Council, were found to have acted with maladministration by agreeing to the protective measures implemented by their counterparts in the North Essex Trust.

The report also said the mishandling of the case meant that Mrs S “did not feel able to contact her sister because of a real and justified fear of further allegations being made against her.” As a result Mrs S was prevented from seeing her sister for three years.

All of the agencies involved have been asked to apologise to Mrs S. Essex County Council and the North Essex Trust have been ordered jointly to pay £1,000 for the distress caused, while the Norfolk and Suffolk Trust and Suffolk County Council have been ordered jointly to pay a total of £500 in redress.

shares

3 comments

  • Bet they will say" we will learn by out mistakes,"&as the normal rubbish councils say after they make a mess up

    Report this comment

    pandy

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • Nothing new really. They do what they want when they want. Then when someone has the balls to stand up and prove they are wrong then we get another bunch of tea swilling biscuit eaters have an internal inquiry about it. Not that we ever get the TRUE results of that inquiry. Just a bunch of glorified contradicary lies AGAIN.

    Report this comment

    Joe bloggs

    Friday, January 24, 2014

  • Bet they will say" we will learn by our mistakes" as this is the normal rubbish councils say after they make a mess up, forget the one I did before to much wine,

    Report this comment

    pandy

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Travellers on St Andrew's long stay car park, Bury St Edmunds.

The group of travellers have been told to leave by St Edmundsbury Borough Council or be taken to High Court.

Sizewell A and B

A study is to be carried out around the Sizewell nuclear power stations site to investigate whether people eating food produced in the area or spending time there are vulnerable to radioactivity.

Thomson Airways' new Boeing 787 Dreamliner touching down at Stansted.

Stansted Airport today marked the arrival of the latest in airline technology with the launch of a new long-haul service from the Essex terminal.

Heavy farme equipment is load on to a low loader during the Suffolk Show clear up at Trinity Park

How do you follow-up the most successful Suffolk Show for years? With an epic Suffolk Show clean-up operation.

East House on George Street in Hadleigh.

A public inquiry is opening today in Hadleigh to decide the future of a popular park.

Police were at the scene

The incident happened just before 5pm near the Railway Bridge and drivers can expect delays in the area.

Police were at the scene

The incidents happened at around 2pm and drivers can expect delays while efforts to clear the oil spill are made.

Essex Police last year searched the area near Scarfe Way in the investigation into the murder of Nahid Almanea.

The teenager from Colchester, initially arrested on suspicion of possession of an offensive weapon in the Salary Brook Trail on Tuesday, is in police custody.

Muriel Munro's injuries

This sickening photograph reflects the brutality inflicted on a 90-year-old Ipswich dementia sufferer by her ‘cruel’ carer.

Train services from Ipswich to London are returning to normal due after urgent track repair work near Norwich.

Most read

Most commented

Topic pages