max temp: 12°C

min temp: 11°C

ESTD 1874 Search

Martlesham Heath: Legal challenge against council’s blueprint for 2,000 homes near BT’s Adastral Park

15:35 17 January 2014

Suffolk Coastal District Council

Suffolk Coastal District Council


A district council failed to properly investigate the impact on the River Deben of 2,000 proposed new homes near BT’s Adastral Park, a High Court hearing has been told.

The campaign group opposed to the plans began its legal challenge yesterday against Suffolk Coastal District Council’s blueprint for growth in the area.

No Adastral New Town (NANT) says the council failed in its legal obligations to consider the effect on the Deben estuary, when it approved the site at nearby Martlesham Heath for the extensive development.

NANT – which maintains the development will have an “irretrievable negative impact” on the area – is asking Mrs Justice Patterson 
to quash the allocation for 2,000 homes.

Any such decision would force the council to go back to the drawing board on its future housing plans for the district – set out in the Core Strategy of its Local Development Framework.

Opening the case on behalf of NANT, a leading environmental lawyer, Richard Buxton, said that it was a “rather complex story” and that the proceedings involved a huge amount of evidence.

He said: “The problem we have here stems from the fact of the proximity of the Deben Estuary not being investigated at an early stage. That is what has caused us to be in court today.

“It is about the council not 
investigating what it should have done when it should. It ignored an essential piece of background to its plan when it should have thought about its implications from day one.”

He argued that the council did not have the “good grace” to accept that it made “a number of highly regrettable errors”, which he said included the “serious error not to consider the highly protected status of the Deben Estuary when it started out in 2006”.

He alleged that this was a failure to meet the council’s obligations under the European Habitats Directive and that, in additional breach of the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive, it went down the route of its preferred option without making a “sustainability appraisal”.

He continued: “Crucially, in the mean-time, it reached a final decision in July 2008 without consideration of the Devon Special Protection Area (SPA).”

That July 2008 decision, he said was “vitiated for various reasons”, including the failure to take into account the special status of the internationally recognised SPA.

He claimed that the council compounded the situation in September 2008 by increasing the allocation of houses from 1,050 to 2,000 “without any consideration of the alternatives for the extra 950 houses” and without explaining it in a lawful way to the public.

Lawyers representing the council are vigorously defending the Core Strategy at the two day hearing. The judge is likely to reserve her decision in the complex action, and to give a written ruling later this year.

The hearing continues.


  • NIMBY's! This country desperately need new housing and it has got to go somehwere, but no-one wants it near them.

    Report this comment

    N M

    Friday, January 17, 2014

  • Perhaps we should know where the money is coming from to fund this case? Could it be other land owners who fear their schemes for development will fail if the most sensible development proposal for the area proceeds.

    Report this comment


    Friday, January 17, 2014

  • Cmon, don't be selfish, we need an increase catchment area (northern fringe, adastral park area) to increase shoppers to Ipswich town centre!

    Report this comment

    Ipswich Entrepreneur

    Friday, January 17, 2014

  • "Devon knows" ?

    Report this comment


    Friday, January 17, 2014

  • I quote “Crucially, in the mean-time, it reached a final decision in July 2008 without consideration of the Devon Special Protection Area (SPA).” I'm guessing you mean Deben SPA ?

    Report this comment

    Sir Casm

    Friday, January 17, 2014

  • How much is all this going to cost the tax payer ? Glad I do not live in the South Suffolk DC area as it must mean higher council tax bills to cover it.

    Report this comment

    The original Victor Meldrew

    Friday, January 17, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Michael Birks leaving Ipswich Magistrates Court.

A Suffolk church verger who told his 70-year-old neighbour “you’ll get what’s coming to you” has been banned from contacting her for a year.

Average speed cameras on the A14 by the Orwell Bridge - but many drivers are still ignoring the warnings.

More than 4,000 motorists were caught speeding during the first three months of enforcing the new 60mph speed limit on the Orwell Bridge.

Local Government Secretary Sajid Javid.

Local government secretary Sajid Javid has spent a day trying to resuscitate devolution proposals for Suffolk and Norfolk at meetings in both counties.

The Air Ambulance in flight

A woman in her 40s was found injured in a field in Essex yesterday.

Traffic on the Orwell Bridge. Image: Andrew Partridge

A person has been successfully talked down from the Orwell Bridge this morning.

John Lewis opened in Chelmsford last month

An Essex woman is calling on retailers to do more for larger women after feeling “worthless” during a recent trip to the new John Lewis store in Chelmsford.

The puppy had horrific injuries and vets were forced to put it down to end its suffering

An eight-week-old Jack Russell terrier suffering from devastating injuries was handed to vets in Braintree on Monday.

Most read

Great Days Out


Click here to view
the Great Days Out


Most commented


Show Job Lists


Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to the following newsletters:

MyDate24 MyPhotos24