Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 11°C

min temp: 3°C

ESTD 1874 Search

Melton: Suffolk Coastal District Council under fire over housing decision

11:00 07 February 2013

Geof Butterwick, of Melton Parish Council, has criticised Suffolk Coastal District Council

Geof Butterwick, of Melton Parish Council, has criticised Suffolk Coastal District Council

A PLANNING department has come under fire for seemingly breaking its own policy to pave the way for new homes.

shares

Geof Butterwick, chairman of the planning and transport committee on Melton Parish Council, has strongly criticised Suffolk Coastal District Council (SCDC). It follows a decision to give the go-ahead to 11 new homes – including three affordable properties – in Woods Lane, subject to agreeing a tree and landscape plan and the finalisation of a 106 agreement.

The scheme was recommended for approval despite being outside the boundary of Melton and therefore contrary to the district authority’s Local Plan and the emerging Local Development Framework (LDF).

The proposals were opposed by some people and the parish council, which in its consultation for the LDF had identified the area as a “green corridor” linking the countryside to the centre of the village.

Mr Butterwick said the fact the development was contrary to policy should have led to a clear “no”.

“Members were clearly concerned by the proposed development, but were told that being outside the physical limits boundary is not a material planning consideration,” he said.

“Sub-committee members mentioned giving local people a say in how their communities were developed. But they were told the site was ‘only just outside the boundary’ and the planning officer thought it was the best place to build much-needed houses. Other sites within the village, which have the support of residents and the parish council, were not mentioned.

“So the parish council asks – what has been the point of the last six years of LDF consultation? What is the point in objecting to any application, no matter how ‘contrary to planning policy’ it might be? We now face the prospect of ‘open house’ for developers. Communities across the district appear defenceless against inappropriate development in inappropriate locations.”

The report to councillors said while the site was outside the boundary it was well related to existing services and therefore suitable for residential development in accordance with national policy. “It is therefore considered that the principle of residential development on this site is acceptable and that an acceptable scheme can be achieved without causing significant harm to the character of the area,” the report said.

A spokesman for SCDC declined to comment further.

shares

3 comments

  • Don't the councils get a few hundred pound incentive per new house from the government now? Then add in the council tax every year. So they will ignore their own planning guidelines. and we'll see a lot more infill building and less green space - unless we can drive there.

    Report this comment

    Ellie

    Thursday, February 7, 2013

  • District planning policy is in chaos. The local planning department is in meltdown. SCDC have effectively run up the white flag on implementing any sort of local planning policy. Everything must fall before the need to meet spurious rolling housing targets. It's bonanza time if you're a greedy property developer.

    Report this comment

    Origami Penguin

    Thursday, February 7, 2013

  • Suffolk Caostal district council has made many descisions against the saved policies and the LDF recently in Martlesham. It approved a gospel church on land outside the boundary purely on the basis that the Brethren couldn't afford anywhere else and houses on Mr Pipes field which is not in the local plan for development. what a waste of time the planning rules are if they can be ignored at will

    Report this comment

    kate

    Thursday, February 7, 2013

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Jonathan Glenister, who has been reported missing

Police are searching for a 20-year-old man from Haverhill who has not been seen since Saturday evening.

The future of RAF Lakenheath will be central to election battle in West Suffolk on May 7

Forest Heath District Council covers a large rural area, stretching from the Cambridgeshire border and Newmarket in the south to the town of Brandon on the Norfolk border.

Blackburn v Ipswich

Ipswich Town have sold almost 2,000 tickets so far for Saturday’s crucial away trip to Blackburn Rovers, and there are still some remaining.

Aerial shot of Ixworth.

Four vehicles collided at a roundabout on the A1088 in Ixworth.

Have you seen any of the livev TV debates ahead of the General Election?

It’s nearly time to cast your vote and with just a week to go before the country goes to the polls, we want to know your current views on several key issues.

Debenham village parish sign.

The leader of a Suffolk village authority has questioned the electoral process after a representative could not stand for re-election due to citizenship issues.

Labour will retain control of Ipswich

Ipswich might be one of the most marginal constituencies in the country, but there is no question about who will win this year’s local elections in the borough, writes Paul Geater.

Police are investigating the incident

Two women have been arrested in connection with the theft of a woman’s purse in Colchester.

Aerial shot of Harwich, Essex.

Business and home owners are urged to be vigilant following a spate of burglaries in north Essex.

Concern over decrease in police officers

Fears for the future of Suffolk policing and officer welfare have been raised again after it emerged the county lost nearly 7% of its officers last year.

Most read

Most commented

Topic pages