Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 19°C

min temp: 11°C

ESTD 1874 Search

Mystery buyer snaps up cliff edge home at Easton Bavents

09:37 17 February 2014

The house at the end of Easton Lane in Easton Bavents, which is just meters from the cliff edge. 

Picture: James Bass

The house at the end of Easton Lane in Easton Bavents, which is just meters from the cliff edge. Picture: James Bass

Archant Norfolk © 2014

A house perched yards from the cliff edge at Easton Bavents, near Southwold, has been sold for an undisclosed sum.

shares
An aerial view of the property taken 

by Mike Page.An aerial view of the property taken by Mike Page.

The unoccupied semi-detached home at the end of Easton Lane was due to be auctioned by Aldreds in Great Yarmouth on March 13 for a guide price of between £25,000 and £50,000.

However, a buyer was found beforehand and the sale was completed on February 5.

The property suffered severe damage from winter storms leaving it just 26ft away from the cliff edge and in imminent danger of falling victim to coastal erosion, It was sold by East Anglia insolvency and business rescue specialists McTear Williams & Wood.

But while it may seem strange to buy a home that looks set to topple over the cliff, there was a reason to buy it.

Under Waveney District Council planning policy DM22, the new owner of the threatened property could be allowed to stake a claim to build another home in the area as part of coastal erosion mitigation measures.

And as well as the owner of the erosion-threatened property seeking planning permission on land which ordinarily would not be permitted, the Waveney Pathfinder project would see up to £10,000 handed over to them to meet legal costs and further cash could be made available to meet the demolition costs of the semi-detached home.

Andrew McTear, partner at McTear Williams & Wood, said: “We have been very clear about the property’s future and have informed interested parties of the problems. “The only reason anyone would want to purchase it is for the opportunity it affords for the development of another site in the locality.”

The owner of the other part of the semi-detached property is Laura Martin, who says she has long-term plans to move into a caravan further inland.

Between the summers of 1996 and 2009 the average annual rate of erosion at Easton Bavents was 6ft 8in.

In order to help property owners, the £1.5m Waveney Pathfinder Project ratified a scheme that will see landowners who bought their homes before 1998 offered up to £15,000 per property towards the cost of a new plot elsewhere in Waveney and up to £10,000 towards legal costs.

Those who bought properties after 1998 will be offered up to £10,000 towards fees and possible financial support for demolition.

Waveney District Council planning policy DM22 also allows for development in the countryside in the “exceptional circumstance” of coastal erosion where it is the “only way to address a particular need”.

A spokesman for the pathfinder scheme said: “The Waveney Pathfinder Project scheme does not provide blanket support for Easton Bavents property owners who are at risk from coastal erosion.

“Although owners of erosion-threatened properties can seek planning permission on land which ordinarily would not be permitted, there remain strict planning criteria which the landowner would need to satisfy.

“They could not just build what they want, where they want it. DM22 says, ‘Replacement dwellings should have no detrimental impact upon the landscape, townscape or biodiversity of the area’.”

Originally the pathfinder project had looked at re-locating nine homes to land known as the Reydon Smear, prompting fears the beauty spot would be ruined by development.

shares

10 comments

  • Surely this use of the funds is wrong as they were originally set up to help those disposed by coastal erosion not someone coming along to benefit from a relaxation of planning controls.

    Report this comment

    Mr. Raspberry

    Monday, February 17, 2014

  • Surely this use of the funds is wrong as they were originally set up to help those disposed by coastal erosion not someone coming along to benefit from a relaxation of planning controls.

    Report this comment

    Mr. Raspberry

    Monday, February 17, 2014

  • Surely this use of the funds is wrong as they were originally set up to help those disposed by coastal erosion not someone coming along to benefit from a relaxation of planning controls.

    Report this comment

    Mr. Raspberry

    Monday, February 17, 2014

  • As is common with Waveney and Pathfinder, this transaction, as well as being "sharp practice" and exploitation of loopholes, provides for the grossest misuse of public money.

    Report this comment

    T Doff

    Monday, February 17, 2014

  • Surely this use of the funds is wrong as they were originally set up to help those disposed by coastal erosion not someone coming along to benefit from a relaxation of planning controls.

    Report this comment

    Mr. Raspberry

    Monday, February 17, 2014

  • the house should never have been put on the market.as daisy roots says it should have nothing to do with the tax payers.

    Report this comment

    TERENCE MANNING

    Monday, February 17, 2014

  • Whatever else happens under the scheme the purchase of this property should be forced to take out an insurance policy to cover the complete removal of any debris resulting from the house going over the cliff. Unlike those at Hemsby who got their mess cleared up at the expense of council tax payers

    Report this comment

    Daisy Roots

    Monday, February 17, 2014

  • Surely this use of the funds is wrong as they were originally set up to help those disposed by coastal erosion not someone coming along to benefit from a relaxation of planning controls.

    Report this comment

    Mr. Raspberry

    Monday, February 17, 2014

  • Agree with Mr Raspberry totally, not sure it is worth posting 6 times though

    Report this comment

    DaveG

    Monday, February 17, 2014

  • Surely this use of the funds is wrong as they were originally set up to help those disposed by coastal erosion not someone coming along to benefit from a relaxation of planning controls.

    Report this comment

    Mr. Raspberry

    Monday, February 17, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Suffolk County Council headquarters; Endeavour House, Ipswich.

How Suffolk schools are rated by local education chiefs is being kept secret – because they say releasing the information is “not in the public interest”.

A 24-year-old man has been arrested in connection with the stabbing of two people in Leiston earleir this year.

A fifth person has been arrested in connection with the stabbing of a man and a teenage boy in Leiston in April.

Kitchen fire is extinguished in Lowestoft.

Fire crews from Lowestoft have extinguished a kitchen blaze.

A sign of things to come? Not quite!

After Scottish and Welsh devolution, the government has turned its attention to how to transfer more powers to local people in England.

Robbie Warner

A day held in memory of a 19-year-old from Suffolk who died while at university has raised more than £5,000.

Catesby House in Sudbury

Residents of a west Suffolk market town take pride in telling visitors that it is the birthplace of the famous artist Thomas Gainsborough.

Jonathan Phipps needs a specialist lightweight all-terrain buggy that his parents can push him about in but there is no local statutory funding available for this £2,193 piece of equipment. Pictured here with mum Carol Phipps.

Fundraisers in Suffolk have stepped forward to help provide a specialist buggy so an eight-year-old disabled boy from near Bury St Edmunds can explore more of the world around him.

Saxmundham Station - which is due to get new information screens.

Rail operator Abellio is spending an extra £4 million to improve stations and trains across the region.

Great Waldingfield Primary School.

A number of measures have been implemented to curb parking problems around a growing west Suffolk primary school.

A care home in a west Suffolk village has been put in ‘special measures’ after being judged inadequate by healthcare inspectors.

Most read

Most commented

Topic pages