A new steering group, formed to help rebuild bridges between a district authority and traders in a Suffolk market town, will meet for the first time in January.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Tensions between the Hadleigh business fraternity and Babergh District Council ran high during the past year after the council’s officers recommended an application by Tesco to build a new store on Brett Works close to the town centre.

In November, councillors voted to reject the proposal and the battle recently came to an end when the retail giant announced it would not be appealing the decision.

The purpose of the new steering group – made up of four district councillors, two Hadleigh town councillors, the town clerk and two members of the chamber of commerce – is to establish other uses for the Brett Works site and to come up with a common vision for the future of the town.

The cross-party and community group, which is being led by county and district councillor Brian Riley, will look at Hadleigh’s commercial future alongside key issues such as the fate of former community facility East House.

Mr Riley told the EADT: “We are at a crossroads and we need to be sure that we are all heading down the same path going forward. At the moment, there are too many disparate ideas running around and not enough joined up thinking, and we have never had any synergy running between the different councils and bodies in the town. “We have seen the local development framework, the shadow of Tesco has been lifted and Morrisons has taken up to 30% of the business off the high street – that is where we are now.

“It’s no good saying that Tesco has gone away so everything will be okay. If we want the town to retain its uniqueness, then we have to work on it.”

According to Mr Riley, the group will “thrash out” ideas for how the town can be shaped both in the short term and for the next 20 years, starting with the future of the High Street.

Hadleigh Chamber of Commerce has been at loggerheads with Babergh’s planning department over the Tesco application. So the group’s president Tony Addison said he was pleased when the council’s chief executive Charlie Adan asked the chamber to be part of the new steering group.

He said: “There are a lot issues surrounding planning for the town where businesses haven’t been involved in the past.

“Given the Brett Works application and the objections, Babergh realised we need to be involved in what the community wants because businesses are an important part of the community.

“Brett Works is one of our major concerns and we want to make sure it’s not earmarked for another supermarket.”

Mike Evans, Babergh’s strategic director for people said the council’s involvement in the group would be “member led”. He told the EADT: “In effect we will be facilitating a conversation between the groups involved.

“The first meeting on January 6 will hopefully be the first of several which will enable us to get conversations going and to move forward together.

“It’s a team effort to bring coherence as to what Hadleigh wants going forward. We (Babergh) are very enthusiastic about it.”

The steering group will be run along the same lines as a group set up in Sudbury a year ago by Babergh’s lead member for economic development, Simon Barrett.

He said: “Because of the Tesco decision, there is a plot of valuable land sitting there in Hadleigh and its future use needs to be resolved quickly.

“The steering group in Sudbury has been taking a strategic look at the town and has already been successful in identifying the problems and getting consensus from all of the various groups involved.

“Hadleigh has many of the same issues and by setting up a cross-party multi organisational group, it should be possible to come up with a common vision of what people would like to see. You can then make the most of the resources you have and come up with the necessary policies to make that vision a reality.

“Hadleigh has a good opportunity now and needs to make it pay.”

4 comments

  • This sounds like a very good idea, and we should also remember that Simon Barrett was the Councillor who poured cold water on the Planning Committee's decision: [quote EADT 20 September 2013]: "I think the protesters who are celebrating the application being turned down are a bit premature. "Tesco is certain to appeal against this result and it will cost Babergh around £250,000 to defend its decision when it goes to a public inquiry. "But it will be very difficult for the council to defend because its own officers recommended the proposal should be accepted. "The legal bill will ultimately have to be footed by ratepayers." Mr Barrett said too much emphasis had been placed on the potential impact a Tesco could have on Hadleigh's High Street economy, adding: "Babergh has a core strategy that says we are 'open for business' but some members don't seem to understand that idea. "The decision appears to have been an emotional one rather than a proper examination of the facts." [unquote!]

    Report this comment

    andrew napier

    Tuesday, December 31, 2013

  • this little group are not worried about what the people of hadleigh want.it is what they want.the little click who have still got the ban tesco notices in there windows in benton street .if they want to do something usefull do as i have done , ask scc to tarmac the footpath between clopton gardens and benton street.

    Report this comment

    TERENCE MANNING

    Tuesday, December 31, 2013

  • it is your own fault the land is still vacant , nothing to with tesco [ a real tory comment]

    Report this comment

    TERENCE MANNING

    Tuesday, December 31, 2013

  • A nice plot of land for yet another privately run care home ?Would it not be better that the land is purchased from Tesco and then used for badly needed smaller social housing. This could then release a lot of under occupied 3 bed roomed council houses.

    Report this comment

    The original Victor Meldrew

    Thursday, January 2, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT