Sudbury: Fears over ‘free-for-all’ shared cycle path

Jon Vale jon.vale@archant.co.uk
Thursday, January 16, 2014
9:30 AM

Councillors have called for action over a cycle path shared by cyclists and pedestrians that has been branded a “free-for-all”.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

The path along Cornard Road in Sudbury came into effect in October, although users have been left baffled as cyclists and pedestrians try to navigate their way alongside each other without any clear signage.

A spokesman from the council said the whole point of the path was for pedestrians and cyclists to mix and be more mindful of each other, which prevents accidents in the long term.

Jack Owen, a Sudbury Town and Babergh district councillor, raised the path at Tuesday’s Sudbury Town Council meeting and suggested it was an accident waiting to happen in its current state.

He said: “It’s the cyclists that are actually raising the concerns, not necessarily the pedestrians who are likely to be the people who are affected. Cyclists are concerned there’s going to be an accident down there.

“I’m finding it difficult to see how the situation is going to be reviewed unless an officer or someone from the county is going to be down there occasionally. I’ve never seen an officer down there.

“I’m concerned about the safety. I’ve got to mention it because I don’t want an accident to happen down there and it be the case we haven’t discussed it.”

County councillor John Sayers said he had raised the matter with council officers, but added: “To me it looks a bit of a free-for-all at the moment.”

The cycle route has been introduced thanks to a donation from Sainsbury’s as part of a section 106 agreement – money paid by the company to offset the impact of its supermarket in Cornard Road.

A spokesman from the council said: “It has been proven that by integrating users together within the same space they are encouraged to become more mindful of each other when using the area. This is something this new shared path offers.

“A ‘code of conduct’ poster has been commissioned to provide some guidance on how this facility should be treated. In addition, a safety check is currently being carried out on this facility to identify any potential safety issues.”

7 comments

  • This path is dangerous. Cycles and pedestrians do not mix well on narrow paths. I I doubt our councillors will do anything until an accident occurs. I wonder which daft ones thought this up

    Report this comment

    BobE

    Thursday, January 16, 2014

  • Schemes like this **never** work. All they do is give a green light to the sort of idiots who'd ride on the pavement anyway and create a dangerous mix of people moving at widely different speeds in all directions. I cycle about 5000 miles a year and I avoid shared paths like the plague. The roads might be full of dangerous idiots in tin boxes, but at least I can be pretty sure of where they're going and what they're likely to do.

    Report this comment

    beerlover

    Thursday, January 16, 2014

  • schemes like this do work - and have been proved to do so. On road systems if you remove the markings and kerbs drivers have to be more aware of potential hazards and speeds slow and accidents are reduced and also reduced in severity when they do happen. It may be that some people are only happy being spoonfed rules.....

    Report this comment

    Richard Smith

    Monday, January 20, 2014

  • Have pedestrians been asked if they want lumps of speeding steel hurtling by them? Thought not. One slight step to the side and BANG....a cyclist smashes into your back. What simpleton dreamt this one up? Obviously not a pedestrian.

    Report this comment

    Supernova6

    Thursday, January 16, 2014

  • schemes like this do work - and have been proved to do so. On road systems if you remove the markings and kerbs drivers have to be more aware of potential hazards and speeds slow and accidents are reduced and also reduced in severity when they do happen. It may be that some people are only happy being spoonfed rules.....

    Report this comment

    Richard Smith

    Monday, January 20, 2014

  • Haha. This is an idea adopted from the continent but trust the British to implement it in a cack-handed and wrong-headed fashion. I assume the council thought it would be cheaper and so didn't think it through. Another balls-up!

    Report this comment

    Baron Samedi

    Thursday, January 16, 2014

  • This path is dangerous. Cycles and pedestrians do not mix well on narrow paths. I I doubt our councillors will do anything until an accident occurs. I wonder which daft ones thought this up

    Report this comment

    BobE

    Thursday, January 16, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT