Suffolk: How the GP funding review is set to affect your healthcare

Dr John Havard Dr John Havard

Wednesday, August 13, 2014
11:13 AM

With a funding review for general practice currently being undertaken by NHS England, one GP has raised concerns that many surgeries in Suffolk could become financially unviable, make a significant number of staff redundant, close or see patients wait even longer for an appointment. Here Saxmundham GP Dr John Havard shares his views about the funding review and what it could mean for the county

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

NHS England response:

A spokesman for NHS England in East Anglia said: “NHS England is committed to supporting innovation and quality improvement in

primary care and reducing health inequalities.

“We need to ensure that there is an equitable approach to funding.

“Where GP practices are receiving extra funding per patient, this has to be fairly and transparently linked to the quality of care they provide for patients or the particular needs of the local population that they serve.

“The purpose of this review has been to put in place a much clearer framework that will enable our area teams to ensure that extra investment in Personal Medical Services meets these criteria.

“The review concluded that there was a need to move to a position where each GP surgery receives equitable funding regardless of which contract they have.

“It also concluded that where GP practices are receiving extra funding per patient, this should be fairly and transparently linked to the quality of care they provide for patients or the particular needs of the local population that they serve.

“Our role is to ensure that funding is allocated in the fairest way.

“Over the next two years our area teams will work closely with local communities to ensure that these resources are used

in the best possible way to provide more joined-up services for patients.”

What is going on?

NHS England is reviewing general practice funding across the land to try and make it cheaper to run. In this era of austerity it may sound perfectly fair and reasonable to reassess the budget for primary care. However a one-size-fits-all reassessment makes no sense when you realise that general practice funding has evolved over the last 66 years with no two practices being alike.

Each part of the country has historically been funded at different levels and within each region different proportions have been spent on GP, community and hospital-based services.

Many practices nationally provide care under a contract called General Medical Services (GMS).

Suffolk only receives 90% of the health budget that it should on a population basis, but there has been higher than average investment in general practice services than in many other parts of England through an enhanced contract called Personal Medical Services (PMS).

This has supported GP to aid recruitment and retention of healthcare workers to provide good quality care.

That extra funding allowed the employment of extra healthcare workers such as GP’s, practice nurses and phlebotomists. Removing this funding now will take the wheels off the wagon and jobs off the pay-roll with worse service for you.

Can this extra practice funding be justified?

Good general practice involves better continuity of care which leads to lower A&E attendances and admissions.

Suffolk enjoys higher than average patient satisfaction rates, better patient access and lower use of hospital services than in the rest of England.

Suffolk has one of the lowest in-hours admission rates in the country and much of this local NHS efficiency is because of the extra investment through PMS in Suffolk over the last decade.

How could these cuts affect Suffolk GP practices?

The current review will affect the PMS practices covering 75% of Suffolk’s population and remove up to 20% of the current funding to these practices.

There is a very real risk that many practices will either become financially unviable risking closure or will have to make a significant number of staff redundant in order to survive.

As a minimum strategy to remain viable practices may have to let go one or two GP’s or an even greater number of nurses.

This will have a profound effect on the high quality general practice that Suffolk has been proven to deliver and actually make the total NHS cost more expensive as we approach the national average.

This NHS England Review will therefore undermine the many decades of work that practices have put in to provide good care for their patients.

Most worryingly there is a risk of a domino effect as practices collapse and patients are unable to sign on at other practices due to lack of capacity.

Is Suffolk really that different from other parts of England?

Actually yes. In 2006, the Department of Health noticed that Suffolk had the most PMS practices in England and wanted to know if patients really were getting better (and more importantly ‘better value’) services.

They found that the NHS costs in Suffolk were less than average, and outcomes better, so left well alone.

The latest NHS patient survey information shows Suffolk practices come almost always in the top 20% in the whole country across a large range of measures.

What is happening nationally?

Successive governments have steadily removed funding from general practice reducing the share of the NHS pie from 11% to 8% while GP consultations have increased by 40%.

General practice accounts for 90% of patient contacts with the NHS so it should be better funded not worse.

Why interfere now?

Why indeed? Ostensibly it is to save money but increased pressure on a reduced number of GPs has the potential to impact on A&E attendance, referrals and prescribing costs. The provision of blood tests, leg ulcer care and minor injury services at your surgery may all be transferred to the hospital after these proposed cuts.

That would be a huge step in the wrong direction and very inconvenient for you as patients.

This is why any savings from the 20% budget cut to practices could be easily wiped out due to all these increased costs elsewhere.

How can you help?

Your Clinical Commissioning Group and the Local Medical Committee representing your doctors are trying to demonstrate to NHS England that we provide both better care and better value than the national picture – but your opinion and support is vital.

The proposed changes have the potential for implications for your healthcare.

If you feel strongly you can raise your concerns about the risk of 20% cuts with your MP and you could consider supporting the campaigns to improve General Practice funding nationally being run by the Royal College of General Practitioners (www.rcgp.org.uk/campaign-home.aspx) and the British Medical Association (http://bma.org.uk/working-for-change/your-gp-cares)

Running your car on bald tyres might save some money now but disaster is just round the next wet corner...

For the latest health news, don’t miss the 8-page EA health supplement, inside today.

6 comments

  • And first prize goes to NHS England in the most obfuscating and jargon ridden response category ......

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Mousemat

    Wednesday, August 13, 2014

  • When most of the county's MPs are died-in-the-wool Tories with business interests in private healthcare companies how is writing to your MP going to make the slightest bit of difference? Vote the b*****ds out next May.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Origami Penguin

    Wednesday, August 13, 2014

  • Why can't this government leave our NHS alone. They will not be happy until everyone has to pay for treatment whether they can afford it or not (in most cases) we British people must stand up for ourselves & vote against this terrible British hating government in the next election, the problem is people don't vote so they work there way back in.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    marlyn

    Wednesday, August 13, 2014

  • @freedomf - Quite so, but it's always worth remembering that, but for the LibDems supporting the Tories and voting through these changes, and thus propping up and perpetuating this rotten Government, we might have had things rather better and rather different.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    T Doff

    Wednesday, August 13, 2014

  • In addition to the posturing by the NHS in East Anglia who are trying to convince us by masses of well rehearsed statements, where is the mention of Mental Health in all of this. There is none, yet previously we were told how wonderful it all was, under the guise of yet another well rehearsed statement. Joined up meaningful actions, not words are needed to attend to the needs of the people of this Region. Not a load of hot air we are fed with time after time, probably in an effort to justify their jobs and high salaries, no doubt.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Seahawk

    Wednesday, August 13, 2014

  • This sham of a government should be put up against a wall and shot for treason against the British People !, they have NO mandate to even govern let alone a top down Privatisation of OUR NHS !

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    freedomf

    Wednesday, August 13, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT