Suffolk: Police helicopter deal a ‘terrible waste of money’

Suffolk Police and Crime Commissioner Tim Passmore Suffolk Police and Crime Commissioner Tim Passmore

Tom Potter tom.potter@archant.co.uk
Friday, June 20, 2014
8:40 AM

The value of retaining a police helicopter for Suffolk has been brought into question after it was revealed that the constabulary is paying double the rate it actual uses the service.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

In the last year, Suffolk Constabulary paid £800,000 for air support to the National Police Air Service (NPAS), but the force helicopter flew half its allocated flying hours.

Suffolk’s police crime commissioner, Tim Passmore, called the current arrangement a “terrible waste of money” and insisted the constabulary push for a change in the way costs are contributed to the national service, which has provided centralised air support since 2012, before which forces operated their own helicopters.

At a meeting of Suffolk’s accountability and performance panel, at police HQ in Martlesham Heath this week, assistant chief officer Phillip Clayton said the past year had been largely positive for the budget, with more savings delivered than required.

But Mr Clayton admitted that any areas of concern would need to be addressed in order to continue in the same vein.

Mr Clayton called the current sir support contract “inequitable” and said he would strongly support pushing for a change in the way costs are contributed towards managing the service provided by the NPAS.

“It’s in everyone’s interest to pay for something on an equitable basis if it’s done nationally,” he said.

The NPAS was brought in with the aim of cutting £15m from police budgets.

All forces were asked to contribute towards the costs of managing the service, with flight hours allocated to each force based on historic use of their helicopter with their provider at the time.

Suffolk was consequently allocated 600 hours - an amount that, over the last two years, has proved to be more than required.

Mr Passmore said: “It is essential to have air support for certain operations, but it comes at a cost that we are not in a position to afford.

“I’m not prepared to use Suffolk taxpayers’ money like that - full stop.

“It’s a terrible waste of money and I’m not prepared to put up with it.”

Norfolk and Suffolk paid a combined total of £1.16m between April 2013 and April 2014.

Suffolk contributed £800,000 and was budgeted for 600 hours of air support compared to Norfolk’s 220 hours, despite being the smaller force.

By March this year, Suffolk had used just over half its allocation but had been able transfer a portion of its hours to Norfolk, retrieving £39,000 and taking down its annual contribution to £761,000 compared to Norfolk’s £399,000.

6 comments

  • Unless there was another reason why it was sent up..??perhaps money could be saved by not using a very expensive tool to ' look ' for shop lifters.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    waspie

    Saturday, June 21, 2014

  • a waist of money no it fights crime not like as is our crime commissioner now that's a waist of money

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    pandy

    Saturday, June 21, 2014

  • Trouble with drones is that they don't make as much noise and would be cheaper. On the downside ...... Oh, there isn't a downside

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    amsterdam81

    Friday, June 20, 2014

  • Why not use the wonderful facilities at Rendlesham and save a bob or two... no-one will mind. In fact lots of people really miss the sound of aircraft there and want to bring back tiger moths and spitfires and jets that go whoossh

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Citizen

    Friday, June 20, 2014

  • I like the idea of having the helicopter to catch criminals but what's the point when the courts are such a joke. Why not just buy half the amount of hours like Norfolk?

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Suffolk Boy

    Friday, June 20, 2014

  • Instead of droning on and boring us, why dont you use a drone? I know the boys must enjoy their toys, but a drone would be a fraction of the price.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    trevorwoolnough

    Friday, June 20, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT