A HEALTH watchdog has vowed to keep a close eye on a “radical redesign” of mental health services as senior clinicians said they still require more reassurance over measures to axe nearly 400 jobs.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

The Norfolk and Suffolk Joint Scrutiny Committee met for a second time yesterday at Suffolk County Council’s Endeavour House to examine the new model for how Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust will deliver services.

The trust is faced with the challenge of making 20% cuts over the next four years.

Initial proposals estimated 502 jobs were at risk but the meeting heard that number had fallen to 395 whole time equivalent posts – representing an 18% reduction in frontline staff.

Emma Corlett, a mental health nurse and Unison representative told the committee: “Our members accept that this is the financial challenge the organisation has been set but members are still not confident how the duty of care will be met within these significant reduction in resources.”

Dr Gillian Collighan, a consultant in old age psychiatry at NSFT raised concerns over the levels of senior medical staff who face the axe.

Initial plans anticipated a 33% reduction in medical staff including a 31% cut in consultant psychiatrists, a 50% cut in staff grade psychiatrists and a 32% cut in senior nurses.

But NSFT’s medical director Dr Hadrian Ball said a review following staff consultation means those figures are likely to be reduced.

Dr Collighan said: “My concerns are that we are haemorrhaging expertise by cutting senior staff. I am concerned that by asking nurses to make a diagnosis based on a structured questionnaire we are painting by numbers, which could be the wrong diagnosis.”

NSFT chief executive Aidan Thomas vowed the trust will conduct additional and more thorough consultations as and when changes are made.

He said: “There will be continuous consultation. We will be working closely with stakeholders and staff to stabilise things. We are proud of open and critical engagement.”

Among the recommendations made was for the Norfolk and Suffolk separate scrutiny committees to re-examine plans in six months as well a requirement that NSFT does not rely too heavily on the third sector and charities.

Chairman of the joint scrutiny committee, Alan Murray stressed: “This is not by any means, the committee rubber stamping the plans.

“We have made strong recommendations that they (the trust) will be closely supervised by both health scrutiny committees.”

Latest News See all

2 comments

  • Ironic that the picture of the chief executive just features his shadow! Wonder how they are going to sort out the cuts in beds in secure units?

    Report this comment

    Dogberry

    Wednesday, March 13, 2013

  • Amazing the difference that scrutiny by elected politicians and the media makes to the priorities of bureaucrats. Originally termed a 'radical redesign' these are now cuts. Originally, the Trust management, some of whom may have been clinicians once but now hardly ever see patients, wanted to cut more than 500 front-line staff yet now they manage to retain an additional 100. Originally, the Trust intended not to cut corporate and central services at all but now suddenly find scope for reductions. The cuts to doctors retreat is not due to the staff consultation but rather due to scrutiny and the intervention of both the Royal College of Psychiatry writing to commissioners and the Trust and threatening to withdraw accreditation for training places and Unison writing to the CQC. But this still isn't over, as the Trust bureaucrats continue to consider themselves more important than the staff delivering services. The plans contain virtually no detail and are not clinician supported, the risk assessment would be laughable if it wasn't so serious and the staff survey shows that morale and faith in the Trust's management is in free-fall. But, as the Trust's risk assessment says, there isn't anywhere else local for most of them to work since the merger of the Norfolk and Suffolk Trusts, so the Trust can treat them with utter disrespect. For patients it is a different matter. There is nowhere else for them to go. That is why this battle must be won.

    Report this comment

    Adrian

    Wednesday, March 13, 2013

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT