Campaigners claim Suffolk’s £133m bid for A12 bypass may be ‘unlawful’
- Credit: Archant
An action group claims its lawyers have found legal problems with the bid for a £133m Suffolk bypass – but highways bosses are confident they acted correctly.
Suffolk County Council (SCC) submitted its business case for the four villages A12 bypass, near Saxmundham, to the Government in December – outlining its expected economic benefits.
The bypass, rebranded the Suffolk Energy Gateway (SEGway), has been an aspiration for many in the affected villages of Marlesford, Little Glemham, Stratford St Andrew and Farnham for 20 years.
But estimated costs for the dual carriageway have increased from £100m last year to £133m this January. And the Bypass Action Group, which opposes the scheme, claims it is a “massive waste of money” which would harm the environment and pave the way for hundreds of new homes.
The group instructed a legal team to look into SCC’s submission of its business case.
The team alleges decisions were taken in breach of SCC’s constitution and are “unlawful”. It claims there was no written record of the process that led to the business case’s submission - despite the constitution requiring it. The legal team has asked SCC to take the decision again in line with the constitution to avoid facing judicial review.
You may also want to watch:
Bypass Action Group chairman Graham Peck said: “The whole thing is astonishing, I’m as shocked in the lapse in SCC’s procedures as I am about the whole possibility of the bypass.”
However, an extraordinary SCC meeting on January 31 last year may show proper procedures were followed. Councillors agreed recommendations at the meeting, including for the council to aim to persuade Government to provide funding for the bypass.
- 1 Map reveals raw sewage overflow into Suffolk rivers
- 2 Rail services affected after person hit by train
- 3 Kieron Dyer in hospital undergoing tests
- 4 East Suffolk village garage to be rebuilt as part of homes plan
- 5 'It was gut wrenching' - Mum's Covid message after son, 12, hospitalised
- 6 Hundreds of calls, fighting off interest, a health scare and a missing man - how Town signed match-winner Celina this summer
- 7 Derelict Suffolk railway crossing cottage up for auction
- 8 Why is this Suffolk address on Covid lateral flow test boxes?
- 9 Woman has heart attack and dies in ambulance waiting for a hospital bed
- 10 'Not enough thank yous in this world' - mum of baby saved by police
An SCC spokesman said: “We take any legal challenge extremely seriously and we are in the process of responding to the concerns raised. We do have a degree of confidence in our position at this point.”
Mr Peck claims procedural complaints were only “part of the wider issue” with others including the “devastating impact on the environment”.
Debbi Tayler, a campaigner for the bypass, agreed everyone wanted a fair consultation. But she added that problems with traffic and pollution on that stretch of A12 would only get worse without the bypass.
The Bypass Action Group is holding a meeting at Blaxhall Village Hall at 3pm on Saturday when it will be providing an update on its work.