Diss: Crime commisioner candidate convicted of speeding

A businessman who intends to stand as an independent candidate in the race to become Norfolk’s first directly elected police and crime commissioner, has been found guilty of a speeding offence in Norwich.

Mervyn Lambert, 64, appeared at Norwich Magistrates’ Court yesterday for a trial after pleading not guilty to a charge of driving in excess of 30mph on Ipswich Road, a restricted road with a 30mph limit, on September 11 last year.

Lambert, of Fen Street, Bressingham, near Diss, activated a static automatic camera device while driving his Mercedes at 36.7mph.

Andrew Nicklin, prosecuting, said although the defendant did not dispute driving the vehicle on the road, or the speed which was taken by the fixed camera, he did have an issue over signage on the road and whether it was blocked and, therefore, whether he was ultimately guilty of an offence.

But Mr Nicklin said, under the Road Traffic Regulation Act, it is a restricted road if there is a “system of street lighting” no more than 200 yards apart, as there is on Ipswich Road.

He said: “The issue of traffic signs doesn’t provide a defence because they’re not required when there is lighting in place.

“If you’re satisfied it’s a road which is restricted because of the street lighting then any issue about any signs which may appear on that road doesn’t provide a defence.”

Most Read

Lambert, who runs a Garboldisham-based plant hire, sales, rental and servicing firm, represented himself during the hearing.

He argued the 30mph sign leading onto Ipswich Road from Daniels Road, where it was 40mph with lights, was obstructed and could not be seen.

He said he also could not see the camera warning sign, with the 30mph limit, situated ahead of the fixed camera and insisted that guidance accompanying the Road Traffic Regulation Act stated signs, when in place on the road, should be “clearly visible”.

Lambert said: “If I was guilty of it I would hold my hands up. I certainly wouldn’t waste your time, waste my time. I could’ve had the opportunity of a speed awareness course and a �90 fine.”

Lambert added he was a “law abiding person” who felt he was being impinged by the proceedings.

As owner of his own traffic management company he said he wanted to set a “good example” and took a “Draconian attitude” to any of his employees who were convicted of speeding.

Lambert, who said the local authority should have maintained the trees to ensure signs were not blocked, added he was just a “law abiding person who was driving down the road trying to make a crust”.

Jill Tallowin, chairman of the bench, said the street lighting system was “sufficient to make it a restricted road with a 30mph limit”.

On hearing the verdict Lambert, who had earlier branded the case “a complete and utter shambles”, left the court before hearing his punishment, insisting he would be appealing.

His licence was endorsed with three penalty points, he was fined �175, ordered to pay a �15 victim surcharge and �620 costs.

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter