Police officers sabotaged series of child sex abuse cases, jury hears
- Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto
Two police officers from Colchester allegedly sabotaged a string of child sex abuse cases out of laziness, self-preservation and a ‘cynical disdain’ for accusers, a jury has heard.
Detective Constables Sharon Patterson, 49, and Lee Pollard, 47, are accused of forging documents and concealing evidence over a three-year period.
The opening of a trial at the Old Bailey on Thursday, January 17, heard the Essex Police officers, who were in a relationship, had told their superiors false information about the cases.
Alexandra Healy QC, prosecuting, said: “The allegations against them involve the forging of documents, concealment of evidence and the misrepresentation of the state of investigations, and the evidence involved in investigations, to supervising officers.
“The effect was that allegations involving child sex offences were not properly investigated.
You may also want to watch:
“The motivation appears to have been a combination of laziness, self-preservation and sometimes a cynical disdain for complainants in these child abuse allegations.”
Patterson and Pollard each deny three counts of misconduct in a public office between 2011 and 2014.
- 1 A12 closed following serious collision
- 2 'Nothing surprises me anymore' - Judge on Town departure
- 3 Stu says: Five observations following Ipswich Town's 3-0 defeat at Northampton Town
- 4 Have you seen this Suffolk pub’s new outdoor kitchen and bar?
- 5 DHL driver apologises after 'dangerous' driving in Ipswich rat-run
- 6 Why have ITFC's American owners issued £18m of new shares?
- 7 'Loving and devoted' - Family pay tribute to mother-of-five found in park
- 8 Grandfather-of-two 'died with dignity' in hospice while serving life sentence
- 9 A blow for Cook as trusted assistant Richardson gets full-time Wigan job
- 10 'We've got to be better - myself included' - Cook on 3-0 loss at Northampton Town
One count against Patterson involves a teenager who said she was raped by her father repeatedly from the age of six which was seemingly supported by a sister’s previous allegations.
Patterson interviewed their mother but instead recorded she was “unwilling” to make a statement, it was alleged.
The mother later left an ‘urgent’ message with another officer asking Patterson for an update.
The jury heard Patterson emailed back to her colleague: “URGENT!!!! ****ing cheek of the woman!! I have left tons of messages on her answer machine and she NEVER responds to them.”
Patterson allegedly advised a supervisor that the case should be dropped, saying the claims were down to a “bitter” ex-wife.
Patterson’s “deceit”, the prosecutor said, “directly contributed to this investigation being brought to a close”.
Pollard allegedly removed and destroyed four photographs that were “important exhibits” to an investigation and also misrepresented evidence to his supervisor so no further action was taken in a separate probe.
The trial continues.