Residents rue missed opportunity after ‘cheese wedges’ approved
- Credit: Hoopers Architects/AUPG
People in Woodbridge have responded with shock and disappointment after the controversial ‘cheese wedge’ housing scheme was given the go-ahead.
People in Woodbridge have responded with shock and disappointment after the controversial 'cheese wedge' housing scheme was given the go-ahead.
East Suffolk Council's planning committee voted to approve proposals for the 100-home King's View development at the former Suffolk Coastal Offices on Melton Hill on Tuesday afternoon.
The proposed houses - known locally as the cheese wedges because of their shape - by Active Urban Woodbridge have attracted a flood of criticism due to their design, as have the developers propsals for affordable housing.
More than 200 objections were lodged against the plans by members of the public, with objections also coming from Historic England, the Woodbridge Society and the National Trust.
You may also want to watch:
Alan Vaughan, chairman of the Woodbridge Society, said he was disappointed with the decision.
He said: "We want it to be developed but the planning process seems to be able to ignore views as they see fit."
- 1 Murder-suicide probe after couple found dead in Woodbridge
- 2 'Our fund is $13 billion and we’re holding $700m in cash' - The money behind Ipswich Town's new owners
- 3 Woman arrested on suspicion of drink-driving following A14 crash
- 4 'You either deliver or you leave' - Cook's message to Town players
- 5 Paul Cook speaks about Ipswich Town takeover for first time
- 6 National Trust 'deeply saddened' at death of volunteers in Woodbridge incident
- 7 Woodbridge community 'saddened' after couple found dead by police
- 8 The first five jobs for Ipswich Town's new owners
- 9 Serious crash closes road in Bury St Edmunds near A14
- 10 Long queues at Primark from 7am in Ipswich as lockdown eases
County councillor for Woodbridge, Caroline Page added: "I hope they will appeal it.
"We have such a need for social housing in Woodbridge. But, as I have said all along, it's not fit for purpose in terms of function."
Woodbridge resident Brendan Padfield said: "I am shocked that our elected representatives can so blatantly ignore the clear and unanimous views of the people they represent.
"The council had an opportunity to make a real difference."
Woodbridge mayor Eamonn O'Nolan said: "Woodbridge Town Council is very disappointed.
"We felt that it failed the test on a number of points including affordable housing."
Mr O'Nolan said East Suffolk Council needed to do more to help affordable housing in the area.
Active Urban Woodbridge Ltd has been contacted for comment.
But David Ritchie, East Suffolk cabinet member for planning said: "East Suffolk Council's Planning Committee South approved the application for the redevelopment of the former offices of Suffolk Coastal District Council on Melton Hill.
"The decision was made following a lengthy meeting where members of the Planning Committee very carefully considered a detailed written report, comprehensive presentations setting out the proposals and the planning issues raised.
"Members also heard the views of the local community, which included representatives from Woodbridge Town Council, Melton Parish Council and local district councillors."
Mr Ritchie said one of the key issues raised by objectors was the level of affordable housing to be provided on the site as part of the development.
He said members were satisfied the delivery of 32 affordable homes out of the 100 planned homes met the council's policy requirement and "would contribute to the stock available for local people in a town where there are known challenges on the availability of affordable properties".
He added: "Following a thorough debate the Planning Committee voted to approve the application, having been reassured that the planning issues raised, including the level of affordable housing, had been fully addressed.
"In voting to approve, they were content the proposed planning conditions to be included on the permission will provide the necessary controls to ensure the development can be undertaken sensitively."