Minsmere: RSPB defends reserve over claims of ‘rampant commercialisation’
CONSERVATION chiefs at a nationally important nature reserve last night defended themselves against claims of “rampant commercialisation.”
Stephen Graham, of Reading, has written to the EADT following a recent trip to RSPB Minsmere.
He said he left the reserve “dismayed by the rampant commercialisation” and compared the site to Disney World.
He was also critical of weekday maintenance work – such as grass-cutting and grass-burning – that he claimed disturbed his visit.
Last night Adam Rowlands, senior site manager at RSPB Minsmere, said the society was sorry to hear of Mr Graham’s experience.
You may also want to watch:
“Our visitor facilities have been recently refurbished to provide the opportunity for more people to enjoy our UK wildlife. As part of this, our welcome area has been expanded, offering the opportunity for all our visitors to get more out of their visit. We can offer insider information on what to do and where to explore so that everyone has a tailor-made experience.
“The membership and the other income streams that we generate enable us to save nature – locally, regionally and internationally. That financial income benefits wildlife directly and ultimately benefits us all by providing beautiful natural experiences.”
- 1 More Suffolk petrol stations closed as PM plans action
- 2 Explained: What is causing the long queues at petrol stations?
- 3 How it all unfolded: Town grab late point against Owls in bizarre fashion
- 4 Lorry drivers being offered up to £60,000 and other bonuses as shortage bites
- 5 Dramatic pictures as huge barn fire breaks out near coast
- 6 Suffolk petrol stations avoid closure as garages shut nationwide
- 7 Blaze spreads from classic car to bungalow next door
- 8 Two arrested after man dies in crash
- 9 Petrol queues worsen rush-hour traffic
- 10 22 Suffolk schools have Covid-19 outbreaks
Mr Rowlands, pictured, said the society used to close Minsmere to allow conservation work to take place but this often led to disappointment for those who had travelled a long way to find it was shut.
As a result, the RSPB opens the reserve seven days a week and endeavours to warn visitors where any work is taking place.
“Without this management work, there would be very little habitat available to the wildlife that makes the reserve so special,” he said.
Mr Rowlands continued: “We endeavour to ensure we provide the best possible experience for people visiting Minsmere. This is reflected in the large volume of complimentary feedback that we receive from visitors.”
In his letter, Mr Graham said he first visited Minsmere 35 years ago – when the visitor centre was a wooden shed.
“On my latest visit it has been supplemented by a glass reception area, complete with a Disney World meet-and-greet welcoming and a blatant commercialisation of the visiting experience,” he said.
“Access to the reserve is no longer down the path to the access road, but carefully directed through the gift shop. Naturally the shop now contains all the revenue generating items needed to bring in the cash to sustain the organisation, its staff and its conservation.
“But one does have to ask: do the ends justify the means? Can the pursuit of money, for whatever good cause, justify the commercialisation of an organisation into just another corporation?”
Sir, - I visited the RSPB’s flagship nature reserve at Minsmere in Suffolk on Monday, August 13, whilst visiting our parents, but left at the end of my visit dismayed by the rampant commercialisation of a site which I first visited as a small boy in the mid-1970s.
When I first visited Minsmere 35 years ago, the visitors’ centre was a wooden shed, later a 1970’s style prefab opposite. Then came the green challis complex, now on my latest visit it has been supplemented by a glass reception area, complete with a Disney World meet-and-greet welcoming and a blatant commercialisation of the visiting experience.
As I only visit once a year, RSPB membership is a bit academic, but I always have to navigate the sales patter of “Oh you’re not a member? You can join here and now.
“If you don’t want to and you’re wowed by your visit, you can join later and get a refund of your entrance fee.”
It’s obviously a scripted dialogue, complete with a lack of eye contact.
Access to the reserve is no longer down the path to the access road, but carefully directed through the gift shop.
Indeed, if you visit the toilet block, there’s a one-way system, so you have to go back round through the gift shop to regain access.
Naturally the shop now contains all the revenue generating items needed to bring in the cash to sustain the organisation, its staff and its conservation.
As my travel arrangements dictate a weekday visit, I almost inevitably have to pay the price of some sort of disturbance by one work party or another.
On the Monday I visited it was grass- cutting in front of the North Hide, on the Tuesday when I visited the Public Hide, large-scale grass burning.
I presume that the weekends are left free, simply because people visiting the reserve want to see birds on the Scrape, and would be up in arms if all the birdlife has been flushed yet again by a rolling calendar of maintenance work, which is simply self-perpetuating.
The RPSB is now big business, the largest conservation organisation in Europe, over one million members and a budget of over �90million a year.
But one doe’s have to ask: do the ends justify the means? Can the pursuit of money, for whatever good cause, justify the commercialisation of an organisation into just another corporation?
I shan’t be visiting Minsmere again for some time.
It’s not the price of the ticket; it’s not the quality of birding, which is influenced by the time of year I can get holiday from works.
It’s the corporate sell-out of a site which captivated and encouraged my early birding, but which has now been roughly shoved out of the way to make way for as much revenue generation as they can get squeezed out of the day to sustain an organisation which is in danger of just becoming another anonymous big business.
n Do you agree or disagree with Mr Graham’s views? Let us know by writing to The Editor, East Anglian Daily Times, 30 Lower Brook Street, Ipswich IP4 1AN, or by e-mailing firstname.lastname@example.org