Villagers ‘ecstatic’ as plans for 80 homes in Boxford are refused

The plans for 80 new homes at land east of Sands Hill, Boxford Picture: THE ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION

The plans for 80 new homes at land east of Sands Hill, Boxford Picture: THE ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION PARTNERSHIP LTD - Credit: Archant

Villagers in Boxford say they are ‘ecstatic’ that plans for 80 new homes in the village have been turned down by a planning committee.

Councillor Bryn Hurren Picture: BDC

Councillor Bryn Hurren Picture: BDC - Credit: Archant

The proposed development, for a mix of two to five bedroom homes on a 14 acre site east of Sand Hill, was refused permission by a Babergh District Council planning committee on Wednesday, September 25, by a narrow margin. The application had sparked a petition from people in the community, with more than 140 names signed. District Councillor Bryn Hurren, who represents Boxford at Babergh District Council, said he was delighted the plans had been refused. He said: "The residents in the village are ecstatic. "There were around 40 people from the village who had travelled down to Endeavour House to protest the plans. "There were two main issues to our objections. "The first was the highways issue, the narrow road through the village - we felt the highways report was just giving lip service. "We were very disappointed with the Suffolk Highways report. "Boxford is a difficult village even to drive through and the congestion is hitting our shops too. "The traffic is dangerous and highways do not seem to get that. "The second was there are no school places at the local school, they were going to have to bus the children from the estate out of the village. "That is a serious environmental issue. We want our developments to be village-led and not foisted upon us." He added: "This was obviously a huge event for the village and its inhabitants, who fought hard against this very unpopular application." The committee voted to reject the application, five votes to four. Councillor Peter Beer, chairman of Babergh District Council's Planning Committee, said: "This was a finely balanced application and the committee spent a long time considering the details. "Ultimately the committee concluded the proposals failed to meet our local policies on various counts, including failing to demonstrate a community need to develop a site outside the settlement boundary and failing to show how the proposal would benefit the local economy." Suffolk Highways has been contacted for comment.


You may also want to watch:


Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter
Comments powered by Disqus