New social media code of conduct proposed for councillors
- Credit: Getty Images/Ingram Publishing
Appropriate social media use for councillors could become enshrined in the code of conduct they must follow, after a couple of high profile incidents in Suffolk over the past few months.
The government has launched a consultation on a model code of conduct for councillors, prompted by the change in ways of working as a result of coronavirus and a greater reliance on digital and remote meetings.
Two councillors in Suffolk quit their roles and political parties in June amid allegations of sharing racist posts on social media – Frank Warby from West Suffolk Council and Robin Vickery from Suffolk County and Ipswich Borough councils – while a number of others also found themselves grilled over other questionable posts.
MORE: Robin Vickery quits councils after hundreds of complaintsSuffolk councils are now responding to the government’s consultation, where it has emerged that social media misuse has increasingly become an issue.
In their joint draft representation, Babergh and Mid Suffolk councils said: “There is an increasing need for clearer guidance for councillors about appropriate conduct on social media both to ensure a high standard of conduct by councillors, to enable councillors to challenge the inappropriate behaviour of others on social media and to provide protection to councillors from social media ‘trolling’.”
The authorities have called for social media use to be enshrined in the code of conduct.
One problem to emerge has been the extent to which complaints can be upheld for misuse of social media from personal social media accounts.
You may also want to watch:
Authorities have a clause in their code of conduct which stresses that councillors must not conduct themselves in a manner which could reasonably be regarded as bringing their office or authority into disrepute.
But council monitoring officers have acknowledged that complaints could not be upheld on a social media post if it did not relate to council business, because it was outside the council code.
- 1 Woman, 29, dies in crash with construction digger near A12
- 2 How the Ipswich Town players performed in their 3-0 loss to Millwall
- 3 Andy's Angles: Five observations following Ipswich Town's 3-0 loss to Millwall
- 4 Matchday Recap: Town well beaten as Millwall win feisty friendly
- 5 Warnock and Dijon boss give updates on Town targets Coulson and Celina
- 7 Ipswich Town 0 Millwall 3: Town are well tamed by Lions
- 8 Where are Suffolk’s outstanding schools?
- 9 Man jailed after dangerous dogs mauled sheep to death
- 10 Mapped: Suffolk postcodes with lowest level of Covid cases
The Babergh and Mid Suffolk response added: “In many cases it is difficult to prove official capacity and therefore the complaint cannot be upheld.
MORE: Frank Warby quits West Suffolk Council amid allegations of sharing racist posts“This can be very unsatisfactory to the complainant and the public, who often consider that any public activity by councillors should be covered by the code of conduct.”
A discussion on the matter at East Suffolk Council on June 29 heard that the new model code of conduct which was being consulted on “made it clear that it applied to all social media, if it impacted on the reputation of the council”.
Any future change would need to be adopted by each authority through their full councils meetings, although it is understood there is a common desire in Suffolk for a united code across the county.