Suffolk: Mid Suffolk and Babergh districts vote against council merger plans
RESIDENTS living within the boundaries of two Suffolk district councils have voted against merging them into one authority.
Voters in Babergh and Mid Suffolk districts had been polled on whether the councils should become one - but a fraction under the required 50% of respondents backed the move.
The merger proposal was more popular in Mid Suffolk than in Babergh but both councils had stated that only if more than 50% of those voting in both districts voted yes would the project continue to the next stage.
On hearing the results of the local poll, Jennie Jenkins, chairman of Babergh’s Strategy Committee, said: “Local people have spoken and from these results, those in Babergh are telling us not to go for merger.
“We are in very tough times financially, and the estimated additional savings from running one council rather than two, will now have to be found elsewhere.
You may also want to watch:
“The integration of the two councils’ staffing structures and services will still go ahead but the two councils will remain as separate legal entities.
“In addition, both councils will need to confront some difficult decisions in making their books balance over the years ahead”.
- 1 The places with the highest and lowest levels of Covid in Suffolk
- 2 Stu says: Six observations following Town's 2-2 draw at Cambridge
- 3 2,000 patients visit A&E because they are feeling depressed
- 4 Four men arrested after man dies at Felixstowe lorry park
- 5 Town get home draw in FA Cup First Round as ex-Blues head to Sudbury
- 6 Jailed in Suffolk: J Block gang members and man who attacked train station staff
- 7 New fishmonger shop opens in Suffolk market town
- 8 US jets to practice flypast over Suffolk this morning
- 9 Detective who trained generation of officers retires after 45 years
- 10 Audi and Jaguar crash into central reservation on A12 at Copdock
Tim Passmore, Mid Suffolk’s leader, added: “It is extremely disappointing that we have a split view from our local communities about our innovative approach.
“We still face the difficult challenge of meeting very demanding financial savings while delivering front-line services and it is unfortunate that we cannot work more closely to achieve our radical and innovative idea for merger.”