THE salary of the next chief executive of Suffolk County Council could be tied to the �142,000 earned by Prime Minister David Cameron.

New government rules mean that any council appointments at a greater salary than the Prime Minister have to be approved by the Department of Communities and Local Government.

And that gives MPs the chance to have a say on how high the salary should be.

Central Suffolk and North Ipswich MP Dr Dan Poulter said: “I see no reason why the chief executive of a county like Suffolk should earn more than the Prime Minister, and if it was proposed then I would make that point when the Government was considering the salary. But having spoken to Mark Bee [the council leader] I know he is aware of the concerns about this and is looking to make an appointment at a much more reasonable salary.”

Figures published by Incomes Data Services earlier this year showed that the average salary of county council chief executives across England was about �190,000 a year.

However Dr Poulter said that the atmosphere had changed over recent months and new appointments could expect to receive considerably less than this.

He said: “I think people recognise that times have changed and they are changing their expectations – the Prime Minister’s salary is still a sizeable sum.”

The county council has not yet started the search for a full-time successor to former chief executive Andrea Hill who has left the authority.

The selection is likely to take several months – and the council is understood to be considering whether to appoint an interim chief executive in the meantime especially as next year’s budget-setting process is due to start in September.

Meanwhile county councillors have been advised by the authority’s interim monitoring officer to take care in comments they make about the departure of the chief executive.

A spokesman for the authority denied that the note from Tim Ryder, interim monitoring officer, amounted to a gag.

He said the note pointed out there were still legal issues to be sewn up and that councillors should be cautious when making comments about Mrs Hill’s departure.