Suffolk: Safety pledge in controversial fire control centre move
FIRE cover will not be compromised if Suffolk’s control centre is moved to Cambridge.
That was the pledge from deputy chief fire officer Mark Hardingham as he unveiled proposals to merge the Suffolk control centre with that from the neighbouring county.
As revealed in Saturday’s EADT, Suffolk is likely to merge with Cambridgeshire’s control room when the existing control room site in Colchester Road, Ipswich, is sold at the end of next November.
And it has emerged that the merger will also save the county a considerable amount of money.
Only eight of the current 23 staff would be able to transfer to Cambridge – prompting anger from the Fire Brigades Union.
You may also want to watch:
As the proposals were officially unveiled before being discussed at next week’s meeting of Suffolk County Council cabinet, Mr Hardingham said senior officers were confident there would not be any impact on safety.
When the region’s ambulance services first merged 15 years ago there were reports of controllers unfamiliar with the area sending vehicles to the wrong place.
- 1 'If offers are higher elsewhere, so be it' - Wigan CEO on losing Evans to Ipswich
- 2 Thunderstorms expected to continue until Saturday in Suffolk and Essex
- 3 Why these Suffolk villages were named among 'most beautiful to visit'
- 4 'We're keeping about 10% of the roster' - Johnson on Ipswich squad overhaul
- 5 Saxmundham man, 26, appears in court charged with 11 child sex offences
- 6 Shop opens at Suffolk village pub
- 7 Man and woman charged in connection with the theft of 85 dogs
- 8 Get ready for League One's 'Arizona Derby' as Lincoln follow Town with Phoenix investment
- 9 Traffic at standstill on A12 between Ipswich and Colchester
- 10 Ipswich Town transfer rumour: Blues 'in £100,000 tug-of-war' for non-league midfielder
However Mr Hardingham said technology had improved significantly – and while local knowledge was valuable, the sophisticated systems now installed should prevent those kind of problems.
He added that a controller from one part of Suffolk did not necessarily have knowledge of every part of the county – but it did not affect the operation.
Merging with Cambridgeshire made a lot of sense – the two authorities shared the same basic IT system and when the new regional control centre opens at Waterbeach near Cambridge at the end of 2012 or in 2013 any staff who had been transferred from Suffolk would be well-placed to move there.
Mr Hardingham said: “From a professional perspective, we are sure that the right decision is being made.”
The county had timed the closure of Colchester Road control centre to coincide with the opening of the much-delayed regional centre, but had recently been told this has been put off again.
That left the county to decide whether to set up its own temporary control centre to come into use by next November or to move in with another authority.
The safety of the public and of firefighters was the main priority – but Mr Hardingham said the Cambridge solution made economic sense.
He said: “Basically moving in with another authority will save us money while setting up a temporary control centre would incur capital costs for an interim solution. That would cost money.”
Cambridgeshire and Suffolk fire services use some different procedures – and while Mr Hardingham said they would continue to be under the command of their own chief fire officers, it was likely that they would adopt some of each others’ methods of working.
He said: “Working more closely we will probably see some of their practices we would like to adopt and they will want to adopt some of ours – but the two authorities will keep the separate identities and this is a process that is anticipated when the regional control centre comes into operation anyway.”
Mr Hardingham said the government had recently indicated that it was still committed to getting the regional centre operational by 2013 – the project has been beset with problems with the computer systems.
That is a project by the Department of Communities and Local Government and because the proposed changes at Suffolk are a direct reponse to it, the government will pay any redundancy costs that are incurred.