Bid for 100 new homes delayed amid fears over ‘dangerous’ junction
- Credit: MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL
A decision on whether to approve 100 homes in Bacton has been pushed back amid concerns that a narrow access road is “dangerous”.
The application for 100 homes off Pretyman Avenue was heard in Elmswell on Wednesday, March 27.
A host of concerns were raised including the number of homes, what will happen to land designated for a village hall and whether public transport routes were realistic.
Mid Suffolk District Council’s development control committee also heard concerns over the proposed access road to the new estate via Pretyman Avenue – a narrow junction which regularly has cars parked around it.
Councillor Jill Wilshaw, who represents the Bacton and Old Newton ward, said: “At the moment we have over 200 houses proposed [across a series of applications].
You may also want to watch:
“Although this isn’t as many as other areas I feel this is our limit.
“We have about 550 homes currently so two thirds more growth is far too many.
- 1 13 Fire engines attend blaze at sugar beet factory
- 2 Hospital visits to be suspended due to Covid infection rise
- 3 A14 reopens after one person taken to hospital following crash
- 4 £1million beach village set for approval as part of resort regeneration
- 5 'Kind and gentle' retired Ipswich Hospital orthopaedic consultant dies
- 6 Where to find the cheapest petrol in Suffolk as prices hit all-time high
- 7 Winners and losers: Hollywood ending, Bersant is back, fans get their wish
- 8 Man indecently exposes himself to dog walker
- 9 Affordable homes project proposed for Suffolk village
- 10 Man in his 50s dies after head-on collision on A143
“The residents and I feel it’s completely wrong because many residents will be driving through Pretyman Estate.
“Cars are parked on the grass verge because there is not enough room so to increase cars two fold is dangerous.”
Ms Wilshaw said previous comments from Suffolk Highways on January 9 suggested the route was not sustainable.
She questioned why its final consultation comment instead said: “It is our opinion that this development should not be prevented or refused on highways grounds as there are no unacceptable impacts on highway safety, or the residential cumulative impacts on the road network would be severe.”
A Suffolk Highways spokesman said that double yellow lines could be painted around the junction if there were concerns about obstructions.
The committee opted to defer the decision for the outline plans, requesting another look at the access to the site and whether the number of homes could be scaled back.
Jon Jennings, agent on behalf of the developers, said the application “has not been controversial” with no stakeholder objections received.
He also said it had been backed by the parish council.
He added: “The applicants are committed to early occupation of the site. This site will provide a meaningful contribution to the council’s five year land supply.”
A spokesman afterwards said the developers were now considering their options.
It is not yet clear when the application may be brought back before the committee.