Six MPs write to government over Suffolk and Essex pylon plans
- Credit: SARAH LUCY BROWN / Office of James Cartlidge
SIx of the region's MPs have written a joint letter to the government over plans for a pylon network which cuts through the Suffolk and Essex countryside.
James Cartlidge (South Suffolk), Sir Bernard Jenkin (Harwich and North Essex), Dr Dan Poulter (Central Suffolk and North Ipswich), Jo Churchill (Bury St Edmunds), Kemi Badenoch (Saffron Walden) and Richard Bacon (South Norfolk) have all signed the letter sent to minister of state for energy, clean growth, and climate change, MP Greg Hands.
They are unhappy with the consultation over the East Anglia GREEN project, which would see a line of 400kv pylons carry electricity from offshore wind farms through 180km of Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex countryside. They say an undersea cable option has not been properly explored.
Meanwhile, a petition against the pylons has hit over 8,400 signatures, as pressure mounts over whether an undersea cable would be a better option.
The letter says: "We are concerned that the consultation does not cover the decision already made by National Grid for the new pylon run to be overground, when it was specifically chosen against a viable undersea cable route – ‘Sea Link 2’ (SCD2) - without any public engagement, or explanation.
"We share the view of many of our constituents that, as far as is practicable, new offshore generated electricity should be transmitted offshore, making landfall as close to the target population centres as possible.
"You will also be aware that National Grid themselves estimate savings of £6bn per year for consumers from a coordinated offshore grid.
- 1 Double-decker bus bought on eBay becomes new home for evicted Suffolk family
- 2 Revealed: The most isolated villages in Suffolk
- 3 Emergency services attending incident in Suffolk town
- 4 Body of woman found in river in Hadleigh
- 5 Unclaimed £83k winning EuroMillions lottery ticket was bought in Suffolk
- 6 First cases of monkeypox reported in Suffolk
- 7 One of north Suffolk's 'most productive' arable farms up for sale
- 8 Ambitious plans to regenerate 'dilapidated' part of Suffolk town revealed
- 9 New owners of west Suffolk sandwich shop promise 'food full of passion'
- 10 The Range secures huge logistics hub at new A14 business park
"Yet, despite all of this, the ‘top level’ choice of overground vs undersea has been presented by National Grid as a ‘fait accompli’, without any public consultation.
"Of course, we are all strongly supportive of the drive to achieve net zero by 2050, and the role that our East Anglian offshore wind plays in that endeavour."
The letter adds: "Given that East Anglia GREEN involved an initial decision to reject an undersea option, and that this is meant to be a public consultation on the ‘choice’ of how the electricity is transmitted – in a context of a Government supporting an offshore grid – at the very least we would ask that the consultation be expanded to permit the public to express their views on the wider choice of overland vs undersea."
Liam Walker, project director for East Anglia Green, said: “This reinforcement between Norwich and Tilbury is essential to carry more clean energy to homes and businesses across the UK, and to help the country reach net zero by 2050.
“We hope local residents will be able to join us and hear more about what we are proposing and give us their feedback on our plans.”