Report could topple pylon plan
CAMPAIGNERS fighting plans for a string of pylons across the Suffolk countryside are hoping a key report released today will provide the strongest case yet for burying power lines.
A crucial independent inquiry into the comparative costs of overground and underground high power cables, commissioned by the Department for Climate Change (DECC) in 2010, is due to be published this morning.
It is hoped the report will mirror research that led to similar plans for pylons in Lincolnshire being scrapped last week.
The National Grid has previously ruled out an underground route for the 400,000 volt power lines, alongside its existing cables from Bramford, near Ipswich, to Twinstead near Sudbury.
It has said burying cable, which would carry power from Sizewell C and offshore wind farms, through some of the county’s most beautiful countryside, would cost up to 17 times that of pylons.
You may also want to watch:
But research commissioned by the Irish Government found technological advancements have driven down the cost of underground routing and as a result plans to build overhead power lines between Grimsby and Boston in Lincolnshire were dropped.
The report also stated that “undergrounding” is the only practical and publicly acceptable way forward for the vast majority of current major projects in Europe.
- 1 ‘Demolition Man’ Cook tells vast majority of Ipswich Town squad to find new clubs
- 2 Mike Bacon: It's going to take more than 'potential' to get into Cook's starting XI next season
- 3 Indian Covid variant being monitored in Suffolk after one case confirmed
- 4 Angry resident threatened with arrest over fake parking tickets
- 5 Woman's body found in village home
- 6 WATCH: Rude graffiti highlights 'huge' potholes
- 7 Wigan kitman Craney given Town coaching role by Cook
- 8 Couple were found 'slumped over' on their sofa, inquest hears
- 9 Classic car show to return this summer with new venue
- 10 'It's been a strange few days' - Skuse gives emotional exit interview
Tom Leveridge, senior energy campaigner for Campaign to Protect Rural England, said he hoped the latest report comes to the same conclusion and added: “We hope it will finally provide some authoritative and independent information on the real costs of burying power lines. We must not have any decisions to erect ugly pylons in nationally designated landscapes without robust and independent data.”
Tim Yeo, South Suffolk MP, said if the cost of burying power lines is only three or four times that of pylons, it would be very hard for the National Grid to resist the call for underground cables.
He added: “I hope we get a more transparent assessment of the cost. I’ve been very suspicious for a long time that the cost of undergrounding has been greatly exaggerated because National Grid simply don’t want to do it.”
Guy McGregor, Suffolk County Council’s portfolio holder for roads and transport, echoed this and added: “We have long argued that the cost of putting cables underground and under the sea is fully justifiable, especially when you consider the awful blight that would be caused by a new generation of pylons being erected across some of Suffolk’s most beautiful landscapes.”
However, Councillor David Holland, a member of campaign group Stour Valley Underground, said he was “very cautious” about predicting the contents of today’s report, explaining the technical needs of a DC power line in Lincolnshire were different from that of the “less stable” AC line planned for Suffolk.
He said: “In Lincolnshire, National Grid saw that it was not such a big difference between underground and pylons and, combined with the opposition that they had, they decided underground was the way to go.
“But here the capacity is much higher. National Grid want to put a quarter of all the nation’s electricity through these valleys, it is not something that has been seen before and it creates very different problems.”
Mr Holland, of Twinstead, Essex, added: “I’m very cautious, we cannot start thinking that the battle has been won.”
Some campaigners have expressed concern that the report was compiled by Parsons Brinckerhoff – a company owned by major National Grid contractor, Balfour Beatty. Quality assurance was provided by the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
A spokeswoman for National Grid said the company were looking forward to the publication of the “authoritative and independent study”.
“National Grid has no inherent preference for any single technology. We examine each individual project on a case by case basis, consulting with communities. This new research will provide important evidence to help inform these decisions and we will take into account the report’s findings in our electricity connection projects.”