UK/Suffolk: UK software firm founded by Suffolk entrepreneur Mike Lynch faces fraud probe
- Credit: Archant
Britain’s Serious Fraud Office is investigating computer giant Hewlett-Packard’s claim that it was duped when it bought UK-based business software maker Autonomy, according to regulatory documents.
The SFO inquiry is the latest legal fallout from a deal that has saddled Hewlett-Packard with massive losses and depressed its stock price.
The US Justice Department started looking into the matter late last year, shortly after HP accused Autonomy employees of fabricating sales in an alleged ruse that drove up the company’s sale price.
Autonomy’s founder and former chief executive Mike Lynch, who lives in Suffolk and founded the company in Cambridge, has strenuously denied HP’s claims and demanded that the company provides more evidence to support its allegations.
HP, based in Palo Alto, California, has repeatedly said that it is co-operating with legal authorities looking into the claims.
It bought Cambridge-based Autonomy for about 10 billion dollars (£6.7bn) in 2011 and then wrote off 8.8 billion (£5.9bn) of that amount late last year in a move that stunned Wall Street.
At least eight lawsuits have been filed by HP shareholders claiming that the company’s board and management botched the Autonomy deal and concealed vital information before the staggering write-off.
- 1 Unclaimed £83k winning EuroMillions lottery ticket was bought in Suffolk
- 2 'I just don't operate that way' - Town owner Steed tells it straight on first visit
- 3 Former town council manager named as woman who died in A11 crash
- 4 Suffolk glamp site 'perfect for romantic retreats' named among best in UK
- 5 'It's going great' - New pizzeria proving a hit in east Suffolk town
- 6 A14 closed after crash involving lorry and car
- 7 Police concerned for welfare of missing Suffolk man last seen two weeks ago
- 8 'Abandoned' cottage and studio up for sale after huge renovation
- 9 'He can trust me to do that' - Leigh on his new challenge at Town
The backlash also threatens to upend HP’s board. Two shareholder advisory firms are recommending votes against the re-election of HP’s two longest-serving directors, John Hammergren and Kennedy Thompson, at the company’s annual meeting on March 20.
Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis & Co say the two directors should be ousted for shoddy oversight of the Autonomy deal and other recent HP acquisitions that have turned out badly.
ISS also is recommending HP shareholders oppose the re-election of company chairman Ray Lane. Glass Lewis is pushing for the removal of two other HP directors, Marc Andreessen and Rajiv Gupta, whose tenures on the board are the next longest after Mr Hammergren and Mr Thompson.
In a separate regulatory filing yesterday, HP urged shareholders to re-elect all 11 board members.
“Losing some of our directors in an abrupt and disorderly manner could undermine our efforts to stabilise the company,” Mr Gupta, the lead independent director on HP’s board, warned in a letter to shareholders.
The Serious Fraud Office said: “As has been widely reported, allegations have been made to the SFO about the circumstances of the sale in 2011 of Autonomy to Hewlett Packard. The Director of the Serious Fraud Office has decided to open an investigation into those allegations, with a view to using its powers of investigation to allow them to be tested. It is, of course, right to point out that the opening of a criminal investigation does not mean that individuals are guilty of a crime or indeed that a crime has been committed.
“It has also been reported that the SFO uses an Autonomy product, Introspect, as a document management tool. The SFO is keen to ensure that there is now no conflict of interest or perception of such a conflict, and it is obliged as a first step to make inquiries to ensure that it can continue as the investigating body. It is undertaking this work at present.
“The SFO will make no further comment whilst its investigation is under way.”
Mike Lynch’s office confirmed that the SFO had been in contact, and said HP’s claims were “without merit”.
“We confirm that we have recently been contacted by the SFO. We had written to them in December to request a meeting because we want to know the substance of HP’s vague allegations and want to have a chance to respond to them,” a spokeswoman said.
“We continue to have confidence that HP’s allegations are without merit and appreciate the director of the SFO’s comment that ‘the opening of a criminal investigation does not mean that individuals are guilty of a crime or indeed that a crime has been committed’. We look forward to seeing the situation resolved as soon as possible.”