New staff absence policy will “punish” county council employees, union claims
Union bosses supporting civil servants in Suffolk have said new absence measures introduced by Suffolk County Council to turn around high sickness rates will only serve to “punish” staff.
Human resources bosses at Suffolk County Council, which employs more than 5,000 staff, admitted during a September scrutiny committee that the sickness rate was too high, with around 55,000 work days lost last year alone.
The new system means greater contact between an employee and their manager is needed and a more consistent approach to return to work interviews.
But the key concern is the planned implementation of the ‘Bradford Factor’ in April – an absence score system for each employee which assess disruptive or frequent absence.
The council announced that two trials are underway, but staff at UNISON have questioned the purpose of the trials if a decision to implement it in April has already been made.
Eastern regional organiser Sam Leigh, said: “Recently forced to ditch the idea of cutting pay, Suffolk County Council have announced their latest attack on staff in the form of changes to sickness absence.
“Rather than truly listen to staff about why sickness levels have risen, or review whether the Bradford Factor will actually achieve what is required, SCC have chosen to impose a system that punishes staff who have no option but to call in sick.
You may also want to watch:
“These are hard working staff who have struggled to maintain the high levels of service to the public through years of cuts and dwindling staff numbers.
“Rather than acknowledge the impact that this can have on their health, Suffolk County Council has told them this week that they are ‘disruptive’.”
- 1 Couple fear they will never sell home after A12 upgrade outside
- 2 Can Town kick on now? Predictions for the next five league games
- 3 Teen among two arrested in armed police incident
- 4 Suffolk man guilty of raping schoolgirl and facing jail sentence
- 5 Jail for man who threatened to 'do a Raoul Moat' and kill police
- 6 Man airlifted to hospital after suffering serious leg injuries in crash
- 7 'We have formed a successful partnership' - Morsy on his Evans reunion
- 8 Britain's poshest train set to return to Ipswich
- 9 Things to do in Suffolk this weekend with friends and family
- 10 Suffolk shops struggling to secure fresh meat as CO2 concerns deepen
Both opposition groups at the council have also expressed their concerns. Andrew Stringer, leader of the Liberal Democrat, Green and Independent group at the council, added: “By punishing staff for their absence levels, Suffolk County Council are trying to completely absolve themselves of any responsibility or blame.
“The council needs to recognise that high levels of stress amongst staff, and consequently high levels of absence, are a direct response to the pressure our staff are under.
“We have cut staff numbers, cut resources and yet still expect them to provide the same level of service for the people of Suffolk.
“As an employer, Suffolk County Council should be supporting their staff – these proposals do nothing of the sort.”
A Suffolk County Council spokesperson said: “A new absence policy has been introduced for staff at the council as the sickness absence rate is high, especially when capacity and resources are very tight. It is a higher rate compared to some other councils and this needs to be addressed.
“We have a lot of support available to staff to help them manage their wellbeing and health and we regularly review and improve this.
“The new policy does not include the Bradford Factor, although we are looking to introduce this in April. We are currently running two pilot schemes on this, to see what works well and what may need to change. There will be discussions with Unison in the coming weeks on how the Bradford Factor is applied and their views will be considered.”