Hundred home plan for former council offices withdrawn by developer

Suffolk Coastal's former headquarters at Melton Hill, Woodbridge Picture: ARCHANT

Suffolk Coastal's former headquarters at Melton Hill, Woodbridge Picture: ARCHANT - Credit: Archant

Uncertainty surrounds the future of a controversial housing project today – after developers withdrew their application for 100 new homes to replace vacant council offices in Woodbridge.

Philip Ridley, head of planning and coastal management at Suffolk Coastal District Council

Philip Ridley, head of planning and coastal management at Suffolk Coastal District Council - Credit: Archant

Plans to redevelop the Melton Hill site, occupied by Suffolk Coastal District Council until December 2016, were approved by the council’s planning committee last October, despite more than 330 objections.

However, the final decision was deferred until April, as councillors sought to resolve a number of issues – chiefly, the delivery of affordable housing.

The committee agreed to 32 affordable units in two blocks – one less than originally proposed by Active Urban Property Group, due to “market concerns” of registered providers taking on separate units in open market housing blocks.

The council’s head of planning, Philip Ridley, was given authority to issue the final go-ahead.


You may also want to watch:


In a letter dated last Thursday, he wrote that the applicants were able to attract only one expression of interest from a registered provider – to take on just 16 units for affordable rent.

Mr Ridley wrote that the committee’s original resolution would allow for the shortfall to be made up by a commuted sum of £1.5million.

Most Read

But, last week, the applicants informed Mr Ridley that the provider no longer wanted the 16 units, and that no other provider was interested – instead suggesting the possibility of vacant building credit (VBC) – introduced to give developers a financial credit for the amount of vacant building floorspace brought back into use or demolished, offset against affordable housing contributions.

The day after Mr Ridley’s letter concluded VBC would not be applicable on the site, the council revealed a letter from the applicant, requesting the application be withdrawn with immediate effect.

The homes were due to be contained within 14 blocks, up to five storeys high, with a community and café space, pedestrian thoroughfare to the river, and underground parking.

Some opponents labelled the design “cheese wedges”, and were concerned about height and density, but planners felt it was bold, with an “acceptable and positive approach”.

It has yet to be confirmed whether or not the applicant will submit a fresh proposal.

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter