Playing on, legal action, voiding it all and financial woe - opinion continues to swirl in week League One could be cancelled
- Credit: Archant
In a week where it’s being reported the League One season could be cancelled ANDY WARREN looks at the differing opinions throughout the division.
Opinion remains heavily split throughout League One in what appears to be a decisive week for the fate of the 2019/20 season.
It’s widely expected that League One will see its season cancelled this week, with Rotherham chairman Tony Stewart suggesting that call could be made on Wednesday, or Thursday at the latest. Then there is the debate surrounding how the final placings should be decided - (more on that here).
There are certainly some high-profile figures objecting to those plans, while others insist nothing has been decided. First among them perhaps is Peterborough owner Darragh MacAnthony, who has regularly suggested the appetite remains among League One clubs for the campaign to be completed.
That’s remained Ipswich’s stance throughout, with Town owner Marcus Evans and general manager of football operations Lee O’Neill stating on a number of occasions their belief the season should be completed for reasons of sporting integrity as well as a belief the club has an outside chance of crashing the promotion party.
While Ipswich are 10th, seven points from the play-offs, MacAnthony’s understandably been more vocal on the subject. His side sit sixth, just three points behind Rotherham in second and with a favourable schedule and the weight of momentum behind them.
You may also want to watch:
The Irishman has discussed the possibility of legal action, depending on how the season shakes out, as well as the prospect of clubs looking at the idea of voluntary administration if the usual 10-point penalty would apply this season, rather than next.
“If Premier League and Championship get their games back on then League One and League Two need to do the same,” he said on Twitter. “Apologies if that upsets people but it’s the right thing to do.
- 1 Family of hairdresser, 17, who died in her sleep 'overwhelmed' by tributes
- 2 Suffolk families stunned after homes transformed on Changing Rooms
- 3 The stats which put Bonne top of the League One charts and firmly on course for a very rare Ipswich Town milestone
- 4 'Complete waste of our money' - uproar over Santa's grotto
- 5 Donacien on his Ipswich Town future and why he wears the No.44 shirt
- 6 Goals, vision and chats with a legend - how Town's loan stars are doing
- 7 Jailed company boss to sell home to repay swindled customers
- 8 Man left with serious injuries after late-night attack in town centre
- 9 Suffolk braced for Indian summer before forecast showers next week
- 10 Channel 4's Changing Rooms comes to Bury St Edmunds tonight
“My press officer this morning has had four players from League One and League Two on asking for me to call their owners as they concerned their owners are not making enough noise about getting their season finished and so many players want to get back and play.
“Those are all just facts I am relaying. Don’t shoot the messenger.”
Leaders Coventry, who are on the verge of returning to the Championship after eight years away, have kept their counsel on the issue, while Oxford, who could be promoted in third place under a weighted points-per-game formula, have stressed they want to play on when it’s safe to do so.
“I’ve heard so may rumours over the last 48 hours, seven days, 14 days, well here’s the rumours cleared up - Oxford United want to play,” manager Karl Robinson said.
“If it’s safe, Thames Valley Police support it, the government allow, if the EFL want it and other teams want it then Oxford United’s vote will be to continue the season at a date that’s safe for everybody, understanding that if it gets to a certain date we can’t spoil two seasons.”
Then there’s Southend chairman Ron Martin who, with his side stuck in the drop zone and certain to be relegated regardless of which formula is used to decide the final standings, wants the entire league to be voided to retain ‘sporting integrity’.
He said: “The competition we started last August is no longer recognisable. If we are unable to finish the season, is allocating an average points per game fair? Of course not. This is a football competition, potentially with many twists and turns, not a pub quiz. Livelihoods are at stake.”
The likes of Tranmere, AFC Wimbledon and Rochdale, also facing relegation battles should football resume, have said very little publicly regarding what comes next, but Accrington Stanley chief Andy Holt has been vocal on the financial damage which could be left behind should clubs with nothing to play for be forced to complete the season without any real means of income.
“I don’t want to take away anybody’s chances of promotion and I don’t want to be interfering with relegation, but I want my club to survive,” he said.
“If the season is restarted, we’d have outgoings going into June and July without any income; so financially it’s worse to finish the season.
“It’s going to cost us about £500,000 to complete the season behind the closed doors.
“There’s a lot of uncertainty about when next season still will start, if they’ll be crowds there or not, or what our income streams are going to be from the Premier League and Sky – they’re all up in the air.”
But, in what appears to be a decisive week for third and fourth-tier clubs, Portsmouth manager Kenny Jackett probably sums up confusion best: ‘Sometimes I feel that it looks difficult for League One and League Two. Other days you hear of perhaps play-off competitions at a neutral venue and you can see that happening,” he said.
“One day I feel it looks unlikely, then the next I am full of hope again. Something like a small competition could be staged – but I have no gut feeling or information past what everybody knows.”